Hi,
On 27/01/2025 12:04, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Hi,
Do we plan/want to fix these REXML vulnerabilities accordingly in
ruby3.1 (6 postponed) and ruby3.3 (1 unfixed) ?
This sounds like a candidate for a (O)SPU task:
https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/lts-updates-tasks/-/issues
We (ruby mainta
Hi,
On Mon, 2025-01-27 at 20:06 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Le lundi 27 janvier 2025, 15:04:49 UTC Sylvain Beucler a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do we plan/want to fix these REXML vulnerabilities accordingly in
> > ruby3.1 (6 postponed) and ruby3.3 (1 unfixed) ?
>
> I will try
JFTR: The ruby
Le lundi 27 janvier 2025, 15:04:49 UTC Sylvain Beucler a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Do we plan/want to fix these REXML vulnerabilities accordingly in
> ruby3.1 (6 postponed) and ruby3.3 (1 unfixed) ?
I will try
>
> This sounds like a candidate for a (O)SPU task:
> https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/lts-u
Hi,
Do we plan/want to fix these REXML vulnerabilities accordingly in
ruby3.1 (6 postponed) and ruby3.3 (1 unfixed) ?
This sounds like a candidate for a (O)SPU task:
https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/lts-updates-tasks/-/issues
Cheers!
Sylvain
On 18/01/2025 09:06, ro...@debian.org wrote:
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- -
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-4018-1debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Bastien Roucariès
January 17, 2025
