On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I think we should do this for as long as it's reasonably possible, given
> firefox
> updates will get harder and harder (they will require newer versions of rustc,
> which may need to be bootstrapped) so having another supported brow
Hi all,
I do not have enough free time to be able to keep up with security
updates to chromium in jessie (oldstable) any more. It is technically
feasible to keep it working in a jessie environment, but each update
has been more and more work. I expect that to continue.
Anyway, if anyone would l
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello dear maintainer(s),
>
> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Squeeze version of bind9:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8000
As mentioned before, please go a
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> If you don't want to take care of this update, it's not a problem, we
> will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would
> like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released.
Please go ahead wi
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Hello dear maintainer(s),
>
> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Squeeze version of bind9:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-4620
>From my perspective, plea
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> But then, this target (copied from update-backports(-*) is never called, just
> like update-backports. doc/security-team.d.o/security_tracker only mentions
> the update-stable target...
>
> So there must be something missing here.
You'll want
>> where's the repo for that code?
>
> svn://anonscm.debian.org/svn/secure-testing
> (as listed on the bottom of the security-tracker pages)
In particular the Makefile, which fetches and parses the package archive data.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.deb
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>> Hmm, according to your announce this upload fixes CVE-2014-4699 which has
>> DSA-2972-1.
>> Or DSA-2949-1 for CVE-2014-3145.
>
> so let's roll a dice? IMO there is no problem / muc
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've refrained from adding "LTS6A-2014-015" to the subject of the linux-2.6
> announcement, as well as from including it in the body. But I think we should
> have some ID there, and I propose to use "Long Term Support for Debian 6
> A
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Why not put up a wiki page that can get continuously updated, and
> actually show which companies have in fact contributed?
Better yet, why not state "This LTS update brought to you by company
X, company Y, and company
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Matt Palmer wrote:
>> Why list the companies, but not the volunteers?
>
> Because:
> - it would become unmanageable and hard to read
> - listing companies is a way to make them accountable of their promise
> (i.e. "tha
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> For the future... is there any site where one can manually download the
> packages waiting on the queue? I know about incoming.debian.org, but
> this openssl:i386=0.9.8o-4squeeze15 don't seems to be there
You can download and buil
12 matches
Mail list logo
