t; Cheers!
> Sylvain
>
> On 03/10/2020 00:41, Ivan Baldo wrote:
> > Hello.
> > The soonest I could try to check, is this Tuesday 6th 19:00 -0300, sorry.
> > Let me know if that's useful or too late.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(
Hello.
The soonest I could try to check, is this Tuesday 6th 19:00 -0300, sorry.
Let me know if that's useful or too late.
Thanks!
El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 10:22, Sylvain Beucler
(b...@beuc.net) escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 02/10/2020 13:51, Ivan Baldo wrote:
> > El
the 'all' and 'amd64' packages
> >> separately.
>
> I can reproduce the 2 debdiff-s with 'debuild -A' and 'debuild -B'
> respectively.
>
> I'm currently backporting fixes from 1.0.27-1~experimental3 to fix the
> issue, and updating our
ould contain possible errors.
>
> This could be due to a bug when building the 'all' and 'amd64' packages
> separately.
>
> Cheers!
> Sylvain
--
Ivan Baldo - iba...@gmail.com - http://ibaldo.codigolibre.net/
Freelance C++/PHP programmer and GNU/Linux systems administrator.
The sky isn't the limit!
Also debdiff libsane_1.0.25-4.1_amd64.deb
libsane_1.0.25-4.1+deb9u1_amd64.deb shows:
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-dll.la
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-dll.
Package: libsane-common
Version: 1.0.25-4.1+deb9u1
Severity: important
Scanners look differently now, some not even appear on the network
(through saned), etc.
debdiff libsane-common_1.0.25-4.1_all.deb
libsane-common_1.0.25-4.1+deb9u1_all.deb shows:
Files in first .deb but not in second
