y file
> - the ones that failed begin with
> -BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-
>
> while the onoe that succed begin with:
>
> -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator
VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computati
On 09/02/16 15:22, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> I must admit to not having been aware of a deadline for it being phased
> out until now, though that's probably just because I've not had the time
> to pay close enough attention.
Apparently I completely failed to either fin
ough that's probably just because I've not had the time
to pay close enough attention.
It's probably good to give people a grace period, even if it's only for
a few weeks, rather than suddenly cutting them off without notice.
All the best,
Chris (just another grateful Squeez
On 10/12/15 11:18, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Running a local server and client and they are different versions
> doesn't cause a problem?
We have squeeze VMs talking to our Galera cluster (Percona 5.5) without
issues.
All the best,
Chris
--
Christopher SamuelSen
irely approbriate to me.
As a lurker and consumer of LTS Squeeze can I give this a +1?
I think it's important to flag a major change like this, if for no other
reason than to be able to say "hey, but we did tell you".
All the best,
Chris
--
Christopher SamuelSenior Sy
