On 02/06/2023 14:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the release of WebKitGTK+ 2.40, the series currently in buster,
> 2.38, has become EOL. Unfortunately 2.40 bumped the compiler and other
> library requirements quite a bit, so a backport wasn't easy, but I've
> managed to do it. It
On 29/03/17 19:32, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
>> I would tend towards fixing this only if it's the former, not the
>> latter. This is, after all, why we want people to upgrade...
> It is wise to upgrade in many situations and I completely agree that the
> newer versions solve many problems. There are situ
On 29/03/17 21:31, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> Given that Wheezy LTS EOL is in 2 months [1]
Sorry. That is wrong. Wheezy LTS EOL is in 1 year and 2 months.
/me goes for some more coffee.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/06/14 12:03, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 04:34:37AM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 06/06/14 03:09, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>>> On 06/06/14 02:06, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>&
On 06/06/14 12:03, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I've commited an updated patch to SVN, but I'm unable to work on the release
> anytime soon.
>
> What remains to be done is
> - Build the linux-2.6 package with the fixes from SVN
Is kind of a beast to build the Debian kernel, took several hours.
I
On 06/06/14 03:09, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 06/06/14 02:06, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I can see on the svn that the updated package for linux-2.6 is ready [1]
>> (or at least seems so)
>>
>> However, I can't fi
On 06/06/14 02:06, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I can see on the svn that the updated package for linux-2.6 is ready [1]
> (or at least seems so)
>
> However, I can't find it on buildd [2] neither on incoming.debian.org
>
> Any hin
On 06/06/14 01:15, Matt Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:30:12PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Looking at the Packages file on the same mirror, I see the
>> openssl packages available for amd64, but not i386?
>
> The amd64 build got uploaded just before a dinstall r
On 02/06/14 09:59, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> As discussed earlier we'll use the same workflow to coordinate work as used
> in the Debian Security Team: A simple text file. I've commited a first
> version to the Security Tracker SVN:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-testing/data/lts-neede
Hi,
I can see on the svn that the updated package for linux-2.6 is ready [1]
(or at least seems so)
However, I can't find it on buildd [2] neither on incoming.debian.org
Any hint?
Thanks!
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/kernel?view=revision&revision=21392
[2]
https://buildd.debian.org/s
On 19/05/14 15:51, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:02:30PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 16/05/14 07:12, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> Based on my experience with security support in oldstable and/or feedback
>>> received from upst
11 matches
Mail list logo
