Abhijith PA writes:
> My recent upload to security-master for the buster security got
> rejected, because glib2.0 (= 2.58.3-2+deb10u3) package is not
> available in the security archive. Can you please manually copy this
> package to security archive.
Done.
Ansgar
Hi,
Ben Hutchings writes:
> As code signing is enabled in buster suites, I think this requires a
> change to the configuration of the code signing service.
Bastian Blank prepared the required changes on our side (dak,
codesigning) and they should be live by now.
Ansgar
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> Given stretch has now reached LTS EOL[1], can you close it for further
> uploads?
Done:
$ dak admin s-cfg set stretch accept_binary_uploads=False
accept_source_uploads=False
Ansgar
rride for both main and non-free which
caused the problem. I removed the non-free one and reprocessed the
upload.
Ansgar
6th will have been in the past on 2020-07-09 (release date for
the announcement). So it should be "The LTS Team took over
support...".
Also "LTS team" and "LTS Team" use different capitalization.
Ansgar
Hi,
the archive side of switching Debian 9 (Stretch) to LTS should be done
now. The architectures amd64, arm64, armel, armhf and i386 remain.
Please notify us if something is not working correctly.
Ansgar
On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 18:38 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 01.07.20 um 11:27 schrieb Ansgar:
> > since LTS for Jessie has ended according to [1], can we disable uploads
> > and prepare for archiving the release?
[...]
> Please wait another week with the deactivation of jes
sure when (5) and (6) happen, but it's never wrong to
free up some space.
Will there be an announcement that LTS support has ended?
Ansgar
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
[2] https://ftp-master.debian.org/keys.html
oads = false,
accept_binary_uploads = false where codename = 'wheezy';
UPDATE 1
Ansgar
some other packages from (old)stable that are no longer
built from source (either due to arch-dep -> arch-indep switch or just
dropped), mostly from the iceweasel/firefox and icedove/thunderbird
renaming.
Ansgar
bxstream-java libpdfbox-java
| libpdfbox-java | 1:1.7.0+dfsg-4+deb7u1 | oldstable/updates/main | source
| libxstream-java | 1.4.2-1+deb7u1| oldstable/updates/main | source
+---
Please reupload the packages rejected earlier.
Ansgar
Hi,
Markus Koschany writes:
> Am 04.05.2016 um 13:43 schrieb Markus Koschany:
>> Hi Ansgar,
>>
>> In preparation for the default Java switch I have uploaded more packages
>> to wheezy-security yesterday and most of them are available in the
>> archive now. How
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/12/msg1.html)
Should I just add dispatch@tracker.d.o to all suites where we sent out
announcement mails for?
And in that case stop sending mail to @packages.qa.d.o?
And it looks like we also sometimes send mail to
@packages.d.o. So many different choices :)
Ansgar
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On 2016-04-26 23:52, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> please remove the non-lts architectures for wheezy-security from
>> wanna-build and the buildds. Only amd64, armel, armhf and i386 are
>> still supported.
>>
>> It would also be nice
x27;t handle
embargoed issues so public logs should be fine.)
Ansgar
need to hit p-u before
> the LTS uploads happen. If this is a problem, we should just revoke
> those parts of the version constraints and leave only the oldstable
> ones.
It even has to be in stable itself, not just in proposed-updates. Which
means one has to wait until the next point releas
a aptitude is using to sort those
> updates so I can't really tell you. I'm putting the aptitude developers
> in copy so that they can reply.
Wouldn't it be technically wrong to list all squeeze-lts updates under
"security updates"? As far as I understood there are
Hi,
Christoph Biedl writes:
> Source: debian-security-support
[...]
> Version: 2014.09.07+deb6u1
Packages uploaded to squeeze-lts should have a lower version than the
one in unstable. Please make sure to use "~deb6u1" instead of "+deb6u1".
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
18 matches
Mail list logo
