Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 03:32:10PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 00:02 +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Personally I'm not bothered either way about whether
> > "-updates" remains something that can be in sources.list
> > without
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:23:46AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Debian LTS is a team within Debian. It's separate from the main
> security team and the stable release managers, but it is no less part
> of Debian.
Sure, I do understand that. My employer is one of the LTS sponsors.
Howev
Hi Matus,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 08:17:54PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>On 02.04.19 10:59, Andy Smith wrote:
> >So are you really saying that your proposed solution is just to tell
Hi Matus,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 02.04.19 10:59, Andy Smith wrote:
> >The alternative is that those users continue using Debian without
> >realising that their packages stopped being supported by the
> >maintainers and
Hi Miroslav,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:53:50AM +0200, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> On 4/1/19 8:14 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> >I do understand that re-adding an empty jessie-updates directory
> >will silence a lot of warnings from apt update, and thus would avoid
> >the quest
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:50:05PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 01.04.19 13:40, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >this is gone:
> >
> >deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie-updates main
>
> formerly volatile.
>
> We have asked if it's going to be re-added, even if empty, to avoid pe
