Re: EOLing nvidia-graphics-drivers for bullseye?

2025-06-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 6/24/25 19:46, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: I plan to contact directly the sponsor to study the impact of (officially) stopping supporting nvidia-graphics-driver. But before that, it would be helpful to know if a full version backport is technically possible or not. Help with that will be ve

Re: EOLing nvidia-graphics-drivers for bullseye?

2025-06-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 6/23/25 20:51, Tobias Frost wrote: However, the version in bullseye, version 470.256.02, is no longer supported by nvidia (since July 2024) and there simply not enough information available to actually fix the issues. Would probably need a newer blob ... Therefore I'd suggest to drop suppo

Re: nvidia-cuda-toolkit for buster

2023-06-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 09/06/2023 16.27, Tobias Frost wrote: Hi, I'm currently triaging nvidia-cuda-toolkit for buster: buster has 9.2.148-7+deb10u1, which is upstream version 9.2.148 with patch 1 [1] This seems to be the latest upstream version from the 9.2 series, and 9.2.x seem to be EOL, so there is no new upst

Bug#992118: squid3-dbg: uninstallable cruft package from src:squid3 in jessie-elts

2021-08-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: squid3-dbg Version: 3.4.8-6+deb8u9 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: close -1 jessie-elts has squid3-dbg 3.4.8-6+deb8u9, but src:squid3 (and therefore the squid3 binary package, too) is already at 3.5.23-5+deb8u4 in jessie-elts, rendering the -

Re: packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-05 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, I found another one in non-free: jessie-lts has amd64-microcode 3.20181128.1~deb8u1 but stretch has only 3.20160316.3 amd64-microcode | 2.20160316.1~deb8u1 | jessie/non-free| source, amd64, i386 amd64-microcode | 3.20160316.3 | stretch/non-free | source,

packages in *-lts newer than in subsequent releases

2021-08-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, I tried to find all the affected packages, but there is no guarantee that the following list is complete. ;-) These packages are out-of-sync since they have a version in jessie-lts (or earlier -lts) that is newer than in the subsequent release(s): * libpam-tacplus https://bugs.debian.org/96

updating non-free nvidia-graphics-drivers in stretch for CVE-2021-1056

2021-01-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, I'd like to update src:nvidia-graphics-drivers in stretch from 390.138-1 to 390.141-1 which fixes CVE-2021-1056 (#979670). For stable, the non-free nvidia drivers are usually updated to new upstream releases fixing CVEs via stable-pu in point releases without issuing DSA. What needs to be don

nvidia-graphics-drivers 304.135 proposed packages for wheezy-lts

2017-02-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, here comes the next round: On 2017-01-10 16:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > I've prepared a new upstream release of the proprietary nvidia graphics > driver for wheezy-lts. This will fix several security bugs: * New upstream legacy 304xx branch release 304.135 (2017-02-14).

Re: nvidia-graphics-drivers 304.134 proposed packages for wheezy-lts

2017-01-13 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2017-01-10 17:38, Chris Lamb wrote: > Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >> I've prepared a new upstream release of the proprietary nvidia graphics >> driver for wheezy-lts. This will fix several security bugs: > > Do you have a debdiff handy...? (Or, better still, di

nvidia-graphics-drivers 304.134 proposed packages for wheezy-lts

2017-01-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi, I've prepared a new upstream release of the proprietary nvidia graphics driver for wheezy-lts. This will fix several security bugs: * New upstream legacy 304xx branch release 304.134 (2016-12-14). * Fixed CVE-2016-8826. (Closes: #848195) * New upstream legacy 304xx branch release 304

wheezy update of nvidia-graphics-drivers 304.xx?

2016-12-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
e list of paths which are searched by nvidia-bug-report.sh for kernel messages. - Fixed a bug that caused kernel panics when using the NVIDIA driver on v4.5 and newer Linux kernels built with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS. * Improved compatibility with recent Linux kernels. [ A

Re: Wheezy update of sendmail?

2016-11-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2016-10-31 23:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Please go ahead - probably we could use the fix (that someone produces > for wheezy) for jessie and sid as well. Please put everything into git, > branch wheezy, the repo is in collab-maint. I have now a completely untested patch for t

Re: Wheezy update of sendmail?

2016-10-31 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2016-10-29 18:49, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:59:47AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Hello dear maintainer(s), >> >> the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are >> currently open in the Wheezy version of sendmail: >> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tr

Re: About the security issues affecting nvidia-graphics-drivers in Squeeze

2015-10-05 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2015-10-05 10:15, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > the Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your > package in Squeeze: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-5950 > > We decided that we would not prepare a squeeze security update (usually > because the