Hi,
On Mon, 2025-01-27 at 20:06 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> Le lundi 27 janvier 2025, 15:04:49 UTC Sylvain Beucler a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do we plan/want to fix these REXML vulnerabilities accordingly in
> > ruby3.1 (6 postponed) and ruby3.3 (1 unfixed) ?
>
> I will try
JFTR: The ruby
Le lundi 27 janvier 2025, 15:04:49 UTC Sylvain Beucler a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Do we plan/want to fix these REXML vulnerabilities accordingly in
> ruby3.1 (6 postponed) and ruby3.3 (1 unfixed) ?
I will try
>
> This sounds like a candidate for a (O)SPU task:
> https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/lts-u
Hi,
(I wasn't present during this month's meeting and Roberto asked me to
check this thread as I recently (re)wrote some FD docs.)
Before checking how to implement this wiki, I'd suggest we define what
additional information we want to track in a wiki (I couldn't find the
information in the
I'm not sure if everyone is subscribed to the issues in the
lts-team/lts-extra-tasks project, so I'd like to highlight a bug I
encountered earlier today in bin/package-operations:
https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/lts-extra-tasks/-/issues/75
I don't think this is a big task/bug fix, so if anyone
Hi,
Do we plan/want to fix these REXML vulnerabilities accordingly in
ruby3.1 (6 postponed) and ruby3.3 (1 unfixed) ?
This sounds like a candidate for a (O)SPU task:
https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/lts-updates-tasks/-/issues
Cheers!
Sylvain
On 18/01/2025 09:06, ro...@debian.org wrote:
---
