Am Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 09:31:31PM +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> So the package can be safely removed I would say and so my proposal
> would be to ask for removal of iotjs in the last bullseye point
> release.
>
> What do you think?
Agreed, that sounds best.
Cheers,
Moritz
Hi,
Here is my July 2024 report for the Freexian LTS/ELTS initiative [1].
Many thanks to Freexian and sponsors [2] for providing this opportunity.
This month I spent time trying to update rustc-web in bookworm and
bullseye to version 1.70.0+dfsg2-1. I have branches ready for that, more
info h
Hi Santiago,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 03:07:51PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As suggested by Moritz, giving the status of iotjs, I think it is not
> possible to support it during the bullseye LTS period. iotjs was removed
> from unstable (and bookworm when it was testing) nea
Hi all,
As suggested by Moritz, giving the status of iotjs, I think it is not
possible to support it during the bullseye LTS period. iotjs was removed
from unstable (and bookworm when it was testing) nearly two years ago:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1354004/removed-10715-1-from-unstable/.
It
El 08/08/24 a las 11:56, Sylvain Beucler escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Since then:
> - gpac was EOLd in buster
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debian-security-support/-/commit/a0bfdf01d404aba46893d2971d776f8f7fb5337e
> - gpac was removed from bookworm
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1430135/gpac-removed
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 11:56:11AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since then:
> - gpac was EOLd in buster
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debian-security-support/-/commit/a0bfdf01d404aba46893d2971d776f8f7fb5337e
> - gpac was removed from bookworm
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/143013
Hello Security Team,
python2.7 was marked unsupported in bullseye.
We recently noted that pypy[v2] (included up to bullseye) and jython
(all dists) include the python2 stdlib. Unlike pypy3, neither package
currently track the associated CVEs.
Do we want to mark pypy and jython as EOL, or l
Hi,
Since then:
- gpac was EOLd in buster
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debian-security-support/-/commit/a0bfdf01d404aba46893d2971d776f8f7fb5337e
- gpac was removed from bookworm
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1430135/gpac-removed-from-testing/
- gpac was removed from sid
https://tracker.debia
