El 15/03/24 a las 08:31, Roberto C. Sánchez escribió:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:06:10AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Hello Roberto,
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Santiago and I are in agreement that at the moment the best available
> > > option is to use dla-
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:06:10AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello Roberto,
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Santiago and I are in agreement that at the moment the best available
> > option is to use dla-needed.txt even for tracking work that needs to
> > happen after t
Hi,
I add here a reminder to use './find-work' (as documented, including at
the top of dla-needed.txt) to look for work _sorted by priority_.
I triaged a few low, non-sponsored, harmonize-with-point-updates
packages this week, and I'm a bit surprised that some were claimed and
even uploaded
Hello Roberto,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Santiago and I are in agreement that at the moment the best available
> option is to use dla-needed.txt even for tracking work that needs to
> happen after the DLA is released, specifically working toward an upload
> to (old)stable.
