On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 14:13 +0100, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
> I think upgrading our Samba servers to Bullseye and then Samba from
> backports (or Michael's repo) is the approach I'll take.
Is upgrading to Debian bookworm after that not possible for you?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWis
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote on 20/07/2023 12:33:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 01:30:32PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>
>> It come to my attention that a discussion is happening about samba
>> and LTS (and the same applies to oldstable too).
>
> It's also worth noting that support for running Samba as
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 01:30:32PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It come to my attention that a discussion is happening about samba
> and LTS (and the same applies to oldstable too).
It's also worth noting that support for running Samba as an AD domain
controller was already EOLed two
Hi!
It come to my attention that a discussion is happening about samba
and LTS (and the same applies to oldstable too).
The thing is: samba packages in bullseye and before, in my opinion,
are hopeless. I know it because I know the state of debian packaging
it was. For years (for a few debian r
