Re: Tracking buster/stable updates suited for LTS

2022-04-20 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Sylvian, I have just tested the patch and it really produces much more packages to be triaged and they are really reasonable! I would propose to merge it into the master branch and start to use it. Thanks for that! Anton Am Mi., 20. Apr. 2022 um 20:54 Uhr schrieb Sylvain Beucler : > Hi An

Re: Tracking buster/stable updates suited for LTS

2022-04-20 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi Anton, There's no need for a MR for this short lts-specific patch, and I believe this list has better visibility for the LTS team than the security-tracker salsa project (where lts-cve-triage.py resides). Cheers! Sylvain On 20/04/2022 18:09, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi Sylvian, thanks for yo

Re: Tracking buster/stable updates suited for LTS

2022-04-20 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Sylvian, thanks for your work! Could you please create a merge request, so we can discuss this nice improvement there? Regards Anton Am Mi., 20. Apr. 2022 um 17:33 Uhr schrieb Sylvain Beucler : > Now with the patch. > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 05:08:20PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > >

Re: Tracking buster/stable updates suited for LTS

2022-04-20 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Now with the patch. On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 05:08:20PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > During my last front-desk week I noticed that we tend to miss or delay > some buster security updates, in particular those that come in point > releases, and a few batches of minor postponed fixes. See for > in

Tracking buster/stable updates suited for LTS

2022-04-20 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, During my last front-desk week I noticed that we tend to miss or delay some buster security updates, in particular those that come in point releases, and a few batches of minor postponed fixes. See for instance, 'dpdk' [1] or 'mailman' [2]. Attached is a patch to 'bin/lts-cve-triage.py' to h