Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 15:21 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > Markus Koschany wrote: [...] > > Please feel free to reassign and/or adjust the bug report as necessary. > > I get the following error message from the BTS. Do I need to do > "reassign 982671 unbound1.9" instead? I also got some e

Re: QEMU upload lost?

2021-02-17 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Sylvain, On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:37:43PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: Yesterday (2021-02-16 16:57Z) I uploaded qemu_2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u13 to security-master. yes, unfortunately: 20210216171008|qemu_2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u13_source.changes|Error w

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Robert Edmonds
Markus Koschany wrote: > Hello, > > Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 14:09 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > > Hi, > > > > #982671 / #982672 is incorrectly reported against the python-unbound > > package. It should instead be against the unbound binary package because > > this functionality is in the u

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello, Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 14:09 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > Hi, > > #982671 / #982672 is incorrectly reported against the python-unbound > package. It should instead be against the unbound binary package because > this functionality is in the unbound daemon. Please feel free to rea

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Robert Edmonds
Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 12:43 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > [...] > > Hi, > > > > It looks like #982671 / #982672 was assigned by the BTS to src:unbound > > rather than src:unbound1.9. I attempted to re-assign the bug to > > src:unbound1.9 with notfound/fou

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2021, 12:43 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: [...] > Hi, > > It looks like #982671 / #982672 was assigned by the BTS to src:unbound > rather than src:unbound1.9. I attempted to re-assign the bug to > src:unbound1.9 with notfound/found but I don't think that worked since I

Re: Supporting unbound in stretch by upgrading to 1.9

2021-02-17 Thread Robert Edmonds
Markus Koschany wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2021, 04:32 -0500 schrieb Robert Edmonds: > [...] > > I would be OK with promoting an unbound package based on 1.9.6-2 (the > > last 1.9.x package) to buster, if that's OK with the release team. > > Hello Robert, > > As you know we have had a reques

Re: QEMU upload lost?

2021-02-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Sylvain, On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:37:43PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday (2021-02-16 16:57Z) I uploaded qemu_2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u13 to > security-master. > > I received neither acceptance nor rejection mail, which surprises me. > > I recently got my GPG key changed (on 01-24

QEMU upload lost?

2021-02-17 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, Yesterday (2021-02-16 16:57Z) I uploaded qemu_2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u13 to security-master. I received neither acceptance nor rejection mail, which surprises me. I recently got my GPG key changed (on 01-24), and I had to push a missing renewal the next day, so maybe the key isn't sync'd, but n