Hi
Reverted the decision that it is minor. Instead added python to dla needed.
// Ola
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 11:30, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Ben
>
> Thank you. I realize that I misunderstood things. It is the server side
> that sends this string, not the user on the client side. I'll adjust my
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 03:28:09PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> So, I'd like to play the ball back to Noah. Do you think, that applying the
> security patches is sufficient for spamassassin in stretch/buster? Or have
> their been so many other fixes(TM) that justify an upstream backport to
> jessie
hi,
today I unclaimed
for LTS:
- opendmarc (Thorsten Alteholz)
- openjdk-7 (Emilio)
- python-pysaml2 (Abhijith PA)
- ruby-rack-cors (Utkarsh Gupta)
for eLTS:
- openjdk-7 (Emilio)
Then, the following DLAs are missing on www.debian.org:
ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 2090-1
ERROR: .d
Hi Ben
Thank you. I realize that I misunderstood things. It is the server side
that sends this string, not the user on the client side. I'll adjust my
analysis accordingly.
This means that a malicious server can cause a DoS on client side.
Best regards
// Ola
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 23:55, Ben Hu