Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
(LTS team: full quote of bug report below)
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:41:59 +, McIntyre, Vincent (CASS, Marsfield)
wrote:
> Dear LTS Maintainer,
If a bug is specific to a LTS package, please report it to the
debian-lts mailing list (I'm sending this mail there to pass the message
on). https:/
Hi Utkarsh,
> Please don't yet patch CVE-2019-16782 for Buster, Stretch, Jessie, et al.
> This security update induces a regression, resulting in some issues in
> using the library.
I see your note in data/dla-needed.txt but may I suggest "reserving"
ruby-rack there to avoid any chance of it bein
Hiya,
Please don't yet patch CVE-2019-16782 for Buster, Stretch, Jessie, et al.
This security update induces a regression, resulting in some issues in
using the library.
Also, there's a slight possibility of this patch inducing a backdoor on
it's own.
The issues have already been opened to/with t
On 13/12/2019 05:41, Brian May wrote:
> Brian May writes:
>
>> Apparently the fix for ibus creates a regression in glibc that must get
>> fixed also:
>>
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/1176
>>
>> However this patch patches GIO in glibc, and it looks like glibc in
>> Jessie (
