On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:20 AM PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> was removed or not? are stil ELTS?
The timeline says that eLTS support ended on 31st May 2019.
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Extended
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
but seems wheeze are removed from security debian but still april 14 and
not present at archive debain
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
El mié., 10 de abr. de 2019 a la(s) 03:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (
poch...@gmail.com) escribió:
> Hi,
>
> During the month o
was removed or not? are stil ELTS?
El lun., 15 de abr. de 2019 a la(s) 11:54, Микаел Бак (mikael@yandex.ru)
escribió:
> Hi list,
>
> Seems Wheezy has been removed from security.debian.org, but isn't added
> to the archive server.
>
> Is this usual, or is it an error?
>
> TIA,
> Mikael
>
>
Dropped the security team from the cc.
install clamav-daemon and clamav-testfiles and then use clamdscan to scan
them:
$ clamdscan /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam*
The unrar test files will come up as not infected unless you also install
libclamunrar7 from non-free. That's normal.
Scott K
Hi
Great
Updated packages are now available on
https://apt.inguza.net/jessie-security/clamav
Testing is much appreciated since I have limited experience of clamav
myself.
I can test that the package installs properly but I'm not sure I can
regression test it properly myself.
Anyone who knows h
That sounds like the right approach.
Scott K
On Monday, April 15, 2019 10:36:31 PM Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi again
>
> I have now compared the 0.100.2 version in stretch to the version 0.100.3
> in stretch updates.
> I can then see that most of the changes that I'm worried about is not
> include
On 2019-04-15 22:36:31 [+0200], Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi again
>
> I have now compared the 0.100.2 version in stretch to the version 0.100.3
> in stretch updates.
> I can then see that most of the changes that I'm worried about is not
> included.
>
> This means that I will take the .orig file an
Hi again
I have now compared the 0.100.2 version in stretch to the version 0.100.3
in stretch updates.
I can then see that most of the changes that I'm worried about is not
included.
This means that I will take the .orig file and include a sub-set of the
updates.
The remaining updates will be:
-
Hi Scott
I have now walked through the difference in the debian directories between
the version in jessie and stretch updates.
I think there is more work than just a simple changelog update.
1) The changelog file contain a lot of changes. I wonder how we generally
should it. If I backport a packa
Hi list,
Seems Wheezy has been removed from security.debian.org, but isn't added
to the archive server.
Is this usual, or is it an error?
TIA,
Mikael
control: retitle -1 7 DLAs missing from the website (or not)
thanks
Hi Brian,
many thanks for all your fixes on this bug!
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 04:03:25PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 1130-1
> > ERROR: .data or .wml file missing for DLA 719-1
> > ERROR:
Hi,
I've done this again, today I unclaimed:
clamav (Ola Lundqvist)
jruby (Abhijith PA)
--
tschau,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes:
> We're tracking at as it's currently assigned by MITRE and it's their usual
> practice to split out secondary angles to a separate CVE ID. As such, you
> should rather reach out to them via https://cveform.mitre.org and request
> a separate ID for the part that affects
13 matches
Mail list logo
