Re: unclaiming packages claimed for 3 weeks or more (Re: november report)

2018-11-26 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2018-11-26 21:20:14, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> Did you try "--exclude linux linux 4.9"? That should work. > > doh, it does. Thanks! (Though I think thats somewhat unusual... but meh.) that's the way all python-argparsed-based comm

Re: unclaiming packages claimed for 3 weeks or more (Re: november report)

2018-11-26 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > Did you try "--exclude linux linux 4.9"? That should work. doh, it does. Thanks! (Though I think thats somewhat unusual... but meh.) > > (the diff is +linux-4.9 instead of twice +linux) > oops. fixed. great, thank you! -- chee

Re: unclaiming packages claimed for 3 weeks or more (Re: november report)

2018-11-26 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2018-11-26 20:48:07, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:06:43AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> $ ./bin/review-update-needed --exclude linux linux-4.9 --lts --unclaim 3w >> [...] >> Editing file to unclaim: salt >> >> I've pushed that, I hope it works for you. > > this indeed wo

Re: unclaiming packages claimed for 3 weeks or more (Re: november report)

2018-11-26 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:06:43AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > $ ./bin/review-update-needed --exclude linux linux-4.9 --lts --unclaim 3w > [...] > Editing file to unclaim: salt > > I've pushed that, I hope it works for you. this indeed works, however I didnt find a way to ignore both linux an

unclaiming packages claimed for 3 weeks or more

2018-11-26 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, so I just ran "./bin/review-update-needed --lts --unclaim 3w" again and it would unclaim src:salt from Mike Gabriel, as Mike has claimed it more than 3 weeks ago and has not stated anything in a note in data/dla-needed.txt. I've decided *not* to unclaim salt from Mike now but rather ask him t

Re: squid3 security update in oldstable

2018-11-26 Thread Abhijith PA
Hi. On Monday 26 November 2018 05:49 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am 26.11.18 um 13:09 schrieb Chris Boot: >> Hi LTS, security folks, >> >> I notice that squid3 was updated[1] in oldstable a few days ago (on the >> 23rd) but no DLA was issued and the security tracker[2] has not been >> up

Re: squid3 security update in oldstable

2018-11-26 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 26.11.18 um 13:09 schrieb Chris Boot: > Hi LTS, security folks, > > I notice that squid3 was updated[1] in oldstable a few days ago (on the > 23rd) but no DLA was issued and the security tracker[2] has not been > updated: > > 1. > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1005422/accepted-squid3-34

squid3 security update in oldstable

2018-11-26 Thread Chris Boot
Hi LTS, security folks, I notice that squid3 was updated[1] in oldstable a few days ago (on the 23rd) but no DLA was issued and the security tracker[2] has not been updated: 1. https://tracker.debian.org/news/1005422/accepted-squid3-348-6deb8u6-source-all-amd64-into-oldstable/ 2. https://securit