Ola Lundqvist writes:
> Interesting. I wonder what the fix do differently in this case. It is a
> little worrying that it exit with a zero return code, but maybe not major.
> On the other hand, if we cannot reproduce the problem maybe it is not worth
> patching... Hmm.
I tried to reproduce this
Hi Brian
Interesting. I wonder what the fix do differently in this case. It is a
little worrying that it exit with a zero return code, but maybe not major.
On the other hand, if we cannot reproduce the problem maybe it is not worth
patching... Hmm.
// Ola
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 07:24, Brian May
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been looking at Enigmail again, after a long journey helping
> people in stable getting that stuff fixed. It's pretty obvious there's
> no way to upload that without first doing a GnuPG 2.1 backport into
> jessie.
>
> That, it turns o
Hi,
So I've been looking at Enigmail again, after a long journey helping
people in stable getting that stuff fixed. It's pretty obvious there's
no way to upload that without first doing a GnuPG 2.1 backport into
jessie.
That, it turns out, requires *four* more source package
backports. Fortunatel
On 11/11/2018 23:18, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-11-11 23:03:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 11/11/2018 15:47, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>> On 2018-11-11 13:21:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi Antoine,
On 09/11/2018 20:37, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-11-05 16:
