On Sunday 18 March 2018 06:40 PM, Gero Treuner wrote:
[..]
>> +// fix docroot
>> +if (uphp.docroot) {
>> +char *orig_docroot = uphp.docroot;
>> +uphp.docroot = uwsgi_expand_path(uphp.docroot,
>> strlen(uphp.docroot), NULL);
>> +if (!uphp.docroot) {
>>
Hi Abhijith,
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 05:13:53PM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
> Thanks for the patch :)
Thanks for looking at it :-)
> It look like ( and also you mentioned) you have added following lines
> from master branch. But I don't see the point of doing these other
> than that the upstream pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi. Gero Treuner
On Sunday 18 March 2018 02:32 PM, Gero Treuner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is a wheezy patch for a security issue:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-7490
>
Thanks for the patch :)
> The upstream patch was
Hi all,
Attached is a wheezy patch for a security issue:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-7490
The upstream patch was backported, and source code apparently didn't
change much. Only a small section (~10 lines) from the current uwsgi had
to be added additionally.
It build and
Hi Brian,
> > So, in fact it may very well be that the size of the TransferFunction table
> > is always at most 3 rows and this definition is right.
>
> Is the code that loads the transfer function safe? Is there any
> possibility of tricking the loading function to try and set the 4th row?
Hum,
> Seems good to me. I would suggest sending a patch upstream, see what
> they think.
Thanks for the feedback ! I'll write the remaining part and submit it to
upstream.
> Also I tend to think some some of assertion might be a good idea,
> something that aborts if
>
> (td->td_samplesperpixel - td
