testing bind9 for Wheezy LTS

Hi everybody, I uploaded version 9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u17 of bind9 to: https://people.debian.org/~alteholz/packages/wheezy-lts/bind9/amd64/ Please give it a try and tell me about any problems you met. It would be nice if you could especially test TSIG. Thanks! Thorsten * CVE-2017-3142

Re: Wheezy update of ncurses?

On 2017-07-11 10:17 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 03:14:33PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: >> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are >> currently open in the Wheezy version of ncurses: >> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-packag

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 997-1] libffi security update

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:52:37AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Package: libffi > Version: 3.0.10-3+deb7u1 > CVE ID : CVE-2017-1000376 > > libffi requests an executable stack allowing attackers to more easily trigger > arbitrary code execution by overwriting the stack. P

Re: Wheezy update of ncurses?

On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 03:14:33PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Dear maintainer(s), > > The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > currently open in the Wheezy version of ncurses: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ncurses > All the open ncurses

Wheezy update of swftools?

Hello Christian, The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of swftools: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/swftools Note that the security team marked a bunch of issues as unimportant but you are free to fix th

Wheezy update of lucene-solr?

Dear maintainers, The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of lucene-solr: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-3163 Would you like to take care of this yourself? I noticed that lucene-solr is seriously out-of-date c

Wheezy update of lame?

Dear Fabian and other maintainer(s), The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Wheezy version of lame: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-9872 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-9871 https://security-tracker.debian

Re: unattended upgrades don't work in wheezy

On 09.07.17 15:41, Chris Lamb wrote: Is this https://bugs.debian.org/762965 ? I don't think so. That bug is caused by someone making changes to config file ("For extra security i have added the parameter n=wheezy.") Ah okay, thanks. Can you file a new bug against unattended-upgrades with a "

Re: Fwd: phpldapadmin_1.2.2-5+deb7u1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Am 11.07.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Chris Lamb: > Hi Markus et. al., > >>> This is probably obvious to someone else, but I am rather confused by >>> this rejection from security-master. >> >> we are currently having a difficult time when we try to upload arch:all >> packages to wheezy-security. For ins

Wheezy update of ipsec-tools?

Hello Christian and other ipsec-tools maintainers, The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issue which is currently open in the Wheezy version of ipsec-tools: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-10396 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow

About the security issues affecting catdoc in Wheezy

Hello Martin, The Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your package in Wheezy: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-0 We decided that we would not prepare a wheezy security update since the impact is low and unlikely to represent a serious issue in

Re: Fwd: phpldapadmin_1.2.2-5+deb7u1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Markus et. al., > > This is probably obvious to someone else, but I am rather confused by > > this rejection from security-master. > > we are currently having a difficult time when we try to upload arch:all > packages to wheezy-security. For instance we receive the following message: […] FYI