Re: Wheezy update of ca-certificates?

2017-03-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: > I need to fix up the jessie PU I have filed (and update to 2.11), and > I'll do a wheezy PU at the same time. Thanks! Debian wheezy is no longer managed by the release team, so you will need to do an LTS upload instead: https://wiki.debian

Re: Wheezy update of ca-certificates?

2017-03-27 Thread Michael Shuler
On 03/25/2017 03:32 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > Hi all, > > I note that there have been some CA removals and additions that would > be nice to have in wheezy, in particular the ISRG Root for LE, thoughts? I need to fix up the jessie PU I have filed (and update to 2.11), and I'll do a wheezy PU at the

Re: Wheezy update of binutils?

2017-03-27 Thread Antoine Beaupré
FWIW, the security team just marked all the currently pending security issues of binutils in jessie as "no-dsa (minor issue)" which means they consider the issues are not serious enough to warrant a security upload. after a quick review of the issues, i have also followed suit and marked the issue

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 872-1] xrdp security update

2017-03-27 Thread Dr. Markus Jasinski
unsubscribe > Am 27.03.2017 um 10:18 schrieb Markus Koschany : > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Package: xrdp > Version: 0.5.0-2+deb7u1 > CVE ID : CVE-2017-6967 > Debian Bug : 858143 > > It was discovered that xrdp, a Remote Desktop Protocol

Re: Wheezy update of apt-cacher?

2017-03-27 Thread Mark Hindley
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:39:09AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > No, I haven't. The initial report was sent in privately from an external > > third > > party via Eduard Bloch, the apt-cacher-ng maintainer. > > I've uploaded and announced this as DLA 873-1. Many thanks. :) > > (The o

Re: Wheezy update of apt-cacher?

2017-03-27 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > (The only issue with your backport was it was missing a "Closes:" > line; however I will manually "version close" #858739 once it has > been ACCEPTed by the archive.) For my (own!) reference, I just realised I could have done something like: $ dpkg-buildpackage […] --change

Re: Wheezy update of apt-cacher?

2017-03-27 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Mark, > No, I haven't. The initial report was sent in privately from an external third > party via Eduard Bloch, the apt-cacher-ng maintainer. I've uploaded and announced this as DLA 873-1. Many thanks. :) (The only issue with your backport was it was missing a "Closes:" line; however I will

Re: Wheezy update of apt-cacher?

2017-03-27 Thread Mark Hindley
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 08:41:55AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > 1.7.6+deb7u1 is now available from http://hindley.org.uk/~mark/debian > > Very happy to review, upload and announce this. :) > > However, before I do, did you request a CVE? No worries if not, I will just > wait > fori

Re: Wheezy update of apt-cacher?

2017-03-27 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Mark, > 1.7.6+deb7u1 is now available from http://hindley.org.uk/~mark/debian Very happy to review, upload and announce this. :) However, before I do, did you request a CVE? No worries if not, I will just wait forit to be assigned if you have. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chri