Re: autotrace CVE-2016-7392

2016-09-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 08:30 +1000, Brian May wrote: > Hello, > > Have had a look at CVE-2016-7392 in autotrace, from a quick glance at > source code, the code does: > > XMALLOC(pstoedit_suffix_table, sizeof(char *) * 2 * (dd_tmp - dd_start) + 1); > > Which I believe is the same as: > > XMALLOC(

Re: wheezy update for libav

2016-09-11 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Hugo, 2016-09-12 0:18 GMT+02:00 Hugo Lefeuvre : > Hi, > > I'd like to prepare an LTS upload for libav[0]. The upstream patch for > CVE-2016-7393 is very simple and could be grouped with patches from older > analogous CVEs like CVE-2015-8662 in a broad LTS upload. > > Does anybody think it's a b

autotrace CVE-2016-7392

2016-09-11 Thread Brian May
Hello, Have had a look at CVE-2016-7392 in autotrace, from a quick glance at source code, the code does: XMALLOC(pstoedit_suffix_table, sizeof(char *) * 2 * (dd_tmp - dd_start) + 1); Which I believe is the same as: XMALLOC(pstoedit_suffix_table, (sizeof(char *) * 2 * (dd_tmp - dd_start)) + 1);

wheezy update for libav

2016-09-11 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi, I'd like to prepare an LTS upload for libav[0]. The upstream patch for CVE-2016-7393 is very simple and could be grouped with patches from older analogous CVEs like CVE-2015-8662 in a broad LTS upload. Does anybody think it's a bad idea ? These CVEs are minor security issues, so we could also

Re: Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 08:27:11PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > > I think you also need to do the build with -sa, as you need to upload > > the full sources to security-master. > > I pushed it to the mentors. That wasn't really something for you, but more something for whoever sponsor this. T

Re: Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-11 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
On 10.09.2016 14:57 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Dear LTS team, Mateusz: Hi Mattia! On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:47AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:53:49AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Adam, (answering in general, not in this particular situation) I'v

Re: Wheezy update for qemu ?

2016-09-11 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Hugo, 2016-09-11 10:23 GMT+02:00 Hugo Lefeuvre : > Hi, > > I've got nothing from the QEMU team, and another security issue has > been reported for qemu[0]. A patch for CVE-2016-7170 is available, > but I'd like to wait for an upstream approval before doing anything. > It may take some time. OK

Re: Wheezy update for qemu ?

2016-09-11 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi, I've got nothing from the QEMU team, and another security issue has been reported for qemu[0]. A patch for CVE-2016-7170 is available, but I'd like to wait for an upstream approval before doing anything. It may take some time. So, I'll upload my changes for CVE-2016-7116 now, and prepare an o