On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:26:05AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 08/08/16 10:20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>> Shall we mark gcc-4.8 as unsupported in wheezy, explaining that its only
> >>> purpose is to enable build of other package
On 08/08/16 10:20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Shall we mark gcc-4.8 as unsupported in wheezy, explaining that its only
>>> purpose is to enable build of other packages?
>>
>> That would make sense.
>>
>> I'll see if I can take a look at this.
>
Hi Thijs,
> > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> > currently open in the Wheezy version of mailman:
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-6893
>
> I'll look into it and will let you know.
Any progress on this? I have prepared an update for LT
Hello Håkon,
the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of mactelnet:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/mactelnet
Would you like to take care of this yourself?
If yes, please follow the workflow we have defin
Hi Brian,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:41:19PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Guido Günther writes:
>
> > There are exploits mentioned in the paper. I think we should test them
> > before releasing a DLA.
>
> What paper are you referring to here?
>
> There is the blog post here:
>
> https://blog.fuzz
> * mailman (0.3 %)
> NOTE: Thijs Kinkhorst said on debian-lts that he wants to have a look
Does anyone know the current status of this one… ?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Hi Brian
I had the same issue a month ago. It solved itself after a few days
when new issues were found.
// Ola
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Brian May wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wondering how I should spend my LTS hours. If I look at the list of
> unclaimed packages for LTS: this list is of p
Guido Günther writes:
> There are exploits mentioned in the paper. I think we should test them
> before releasing a DLA.
What paper are you referring to here?
There is the blog post here:
https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/51-Fun-with-Bignums-Crashing-MatrixSSL-and-more.html
However I don't see
