-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello dear maintainer(s),
the Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your
package in Wheezy:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-1504
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-1503
We decided t
Hi ruby-activerecord-3.2 maintainer(s) and Debian LTS team
This is my third package contribution to Debian LTS. I'm doing this as a
training exercise and this is why the maintainer have not been asked to
this for me.
I have prepared an update of the ruby-activerecord-3.2 package with a fix
for
ht
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:29:22PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:34:29PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> > I'm currently looking into building icedove 45 for Wheezy-LTS. I wonder
> > if I should do the same for Iceweasel or if you intend to keep
> > maintaining I
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:34:29PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> I'm currently looking into building icedove 45 for Wheezy-LTS. I wonder
> if I should do the same for Iceweasel or if you intend to keep
> maintaining Iceweasel in LTS yourself?
I don't know yet. The last message in bug 81
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello dear maintainer(s),
The Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your
package in Wheezy:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1820
We decided that we would not prepare a wheezy security update (usually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello dear maintainer(s),
the Debian LTS team recently reviewed the security issue(s) affecting your
package in Wheezy:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1840
We decided that we would not prepare a wheezy security update (usually
Thanks a lot!
// Ola
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Ola,
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi Salvatore
> >
> > Thanks for quick answer.
> >
> > Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
> >
Hi Ola,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Salvatore
>
> Thanks for quick answer.
>
> Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
> processed yet.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-changes/2016/05/msg00063.html
Regards,
Salvatore
Hi Ola,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Salvatore
>
> Thanks for quick answer.
>
> Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
> processed yet.
>
> A CVE request was made half a year ago, but none assigned that I could find.
Yes
Hi
I have now fixed this problem. Thanks again.
// Ola
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 26.05.2016 um 09:21 schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> > Hi Markus
> >
> > I realized (too late) that I had not checked the dak mail before I sent
> > the mail. Sorry about that.
> >
> >
Hi Salvatore
Thanks for quick answer.
Yes I have seen that and uploaded to the archive. I guess it has not been
processed yet.
A CVE request was made half a year ago, but none assigned that I could find.
Regarding the addition if a line to data/CVE/list. Shall I add it to a
dummy id because the
Hi,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:11:42PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have now fixed ruby-mail and the problem described there did not have a
> CVE identifier.
> See here:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ruby-mail
> Instead it has a TEMP-000-8B2928 identif
Hi
I have now fixed ruby-mail and the problem described there did not have a
CVE identifier.
See here:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/ruby-mail
Instead it has a TEMP-000-8B2928 identifier.
How do I mark that one as fixed?
I could not add TEMP-... to to gen-DLA com
Dear Baxtiyor,
the Debian Wheezy is now supported by Debian LTS team that can be
contacted via: debian-lts@lists.debian.org
However you didn't specify any package version, so it's unlikely that
anybody can help you if you don't provide more details first like the
version of:
php5-common
php5-cli
El 23/05/16 a las 22:28, Andrew Bartlett escribió:
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:47 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On 2016-04-29 08:55:43, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > > Dear Samba maintainers,
> > >
> > > Any updates about this bug?
> > >
> > > LTS Team, anyone could help to handle it?
> > >
Hi
Thanks. That explains why I did not get that mail.
/ Ola
Sent from a phone
Den 26 maj 2016 09:28 skrev "Markus Koschany" :
> Am 26.05.2016 um 09:21 schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> > Hi Markus
> >
> > I realized (too late) that I had not checked the dak mail before I sent
> > the mail. Sorry about
Am 26.05.2016 um 09:21 schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> Hi Markus
>
> I realized (too late) that I had not checked the dak mail before I sent
> the mail. Sorry about that.
>
> Thanks for the note about sa option. I'll fix this as soon as possible.
> Do you think I need to step the revision or is a reupl
Hi Markus
I realized (too late) that I had not checked the dak mail before I sent the
mail. Sorry about that.
Thanks for the note about sa option. I'll fix this as soon as possible. Do
you think I need to step the revision or is a reupload good enough?
/ Ola
Sent from a phone
Den 26 maj 2016 0
Hi Ola,
you have sent the security announcement for ruby-mail yesterday but the
package hasn't been uploaded yet. One reason for that might be that it
is the first upload to security-master thus ruby-mail must be built with
-sa. You can follow all changes at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-ch
19 matches
Mail list logo
