On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:13:34PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> (Please CC me, I'm not subscribed.)
>
> Hi
>
> On 2016-05-02 20:46:37, Brian May wrote:
> > Raphael Hertzog writes:
> >
> > > There's also an alternate way to go forward... continue to support
> > > the current version with p
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:10:48PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > No, I recommend to EOL src:qemu/qemu-kvm in wheezy (the bits relevant to
> > src:xen are
> > somewhat isolated and can be backported from the Xen Security announcements)
> > Backporting jessie's qemu will end up in a similar situat
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:28:50pm +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Added CC Debian Libidn Team
>
> I now have fixed the packages libidn packages initially produced by
> Alessandro Ghedini and destined for wheezy-security and jessie-security.
> They now build fine.
>
> In particular, for the Jessie ver
Antoine Beaupré writes:
> I reviewed the patch quickly, nothing strikes me as completely wrong,
> but I am not currently in a position to test the patchset.
Unless there are any objections I plan on rechecking this and uploading
this to wheezy-security, Monday, Melbourne timezone.
--
Brian May
"Simon Iremonger (debian)" writes:
>>> So there's *another* escalation through Qemu/HVM to backport. I wonder
>>> if it's worth postponing this upload?
> By the looks of things that only affects HVM mode and only with
> a non-default video adapter.
>
> I think the other patches actually being rel
