Hello dear maintainer(s),
the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of libuser:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3246
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3245
Would you like to take care of this yo
Hi,
TL;DR: debdiff below, features only changes to debian/changelog and
debian/patches (apart from the upstream upgrade of course). Binary
packages in:
https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/wheezy-lts/
Long story follows...
So I *believe* I have correctly completed the backport of
Hello dear maintainer(s),
the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Wheezy version of librsvg:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-4348
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-4347
Would you like to take care of this yo
Am 04.05.2016 um 21:07 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
[...]
>> 2. Should it be uploaded to wheezy-security even if it doesn't fix any
>>security fix? Or does the wheezy queue in ftp-master still works
>>(with ftp-masters' participation)?
>
> We were aware that we would have some non-security upl
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 19:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > As I understand it, packages are never moved directly from oldstable-
> > security to archive.debian.org. Normally they are copied to oldstable
> > in a final point release,
Hi,
On Wed, 04 May 2016, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> 1. I had included in the pu/wheezy-lts branch changes to close
>https://bugs.debian.org/818843 thinking that it was useful for
>wheezy-lts users. But uploads to wheezy (and stable) should be
>limited to updating the status list fi
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> As I understand it, packages are never moved directly from oldstable-
> security to archive.debian.org. Normally they are copied to oldstable
> in a final point release, and then moved to archive.debian.org. In
> this case, there was a poi
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 16:48 +0200, Tom Turelinckx wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> This approach works fine, thanks for the suggestion:
>
> deb http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://ftp.be.debian
Hi everybody,
The last month of April, I had available 15 hours in total paid by Freexian to
work on LTS, but I have only spent 7.5. This is mainly what I did:
* mysql-5.5: handle the new upstream version of the package prepared by Lars
Tangvald, test it, and upload the
[DLA
447-1](https://l
Hi,
After uploading a debian-security-support release to unstable, I have
some doubts about what we are able to upload to wheezy, and I prefer to
ask :)
1. I had included in the pu/wheezy-lts branch changes to close
https://bugs.debian.org/818843 thinking that it was useful for
wheezy-lts u
> On Tue, 03 May 2016 at 10:47:31 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> I agree, however I suspect most people using roundcube in production are
>> probably using the backport... There's even a dangling backport in
>> wheezy right now (0.9)... a little messy.
> Am 03.05.2016 um 17:49 schrieb Guilhem Mo
Hello Paul,
This approach works fine, thanks for the suggestion:
deb http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.be.de
Hi Ansgar,
In preparation for the default Java switch I have uploaded more packages
to wheezy-security yesterday and most of them are available in the
archive now. However some of them never showed up there, although I made
sure to build with -sa. I guess there is an issue with dak again.
The fol
For instance, I run the unstable wordpress on a wheezy machine. And
each wordpress upgrade is painless, but a full upgrade to jessie would
be much more time consuming.
I agree for wordpress.
But roundcube is a litle different. You don't have to run it on the
email serveur. It's just a box wi
Hi,
On Tue, 03 May 2016, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> What's the point in updating a server package like roundcube in LTS
> to the version from LTS+1? I creates significant churn on the sysadmin's
> side, which is better spent on upgrading the entire VM/machine to LTS+1.
I don't think this is enti
15 matches
Mail list logo
