Re: working for wheezy-security until wheezy-lts starts

2016-04-22 Thread Brian May
Brian May writes: > Whoops. Just noticed that libpostproc-dev is provided by the old libav, > however not provided by the new libav. I had thought it was another > source package. What do I do with ffmpeg? Looks like this use to be provided by libav. Jessie doesn't have ffmpeg (except in backp

Re: working for wheezy-security until wheezy-lts starts

2016-04-22 Thread Brian May
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: > In general, all the libav transitions have been handled via the BTS, so > patches > should be found there. Some packages also ended up being > incompatible/abandoned > and were eventuall removed, so please also check whether any of the failing > packages are actuall

Re: working for wheezy-security until wheezy-lts starts

2016-04-22 Thread Brian May
Brian May writes: > libpostproc-dev will be uninstallable - does this matter? Whoops. Just noticed that libpostproc-dev is provided by the old libav, however not provided by the new libav. I had thought it was another source package. So any packages that depend on it will need to be fixed not t

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-04-22 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 03:17:19pm -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2016-04-16 18:46:50, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > >> (Fixed list address, sorry for the duplicate.) > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have looked at porting the securi

Re: libidn test packages [resent]

2016-04-22 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2016-04-16 18:46:50, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:20:04PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> (Fixed list address, sorry for the duplicate.) >> >> Hi, >> >> I have looked at porting the security fixes on the libidn package from >> squeeze to wheezy. As usual, signed test

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-22 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Raphael Hertzog I am not speaking on behalf of DSA here. > The LTS period is about to start soon and we will send out an announce > soon... it would be nice to be able to say a word about armel/armhf, so > an official confirmation from ftpmasters/DSA would be nice. So, I'm a bit divided on a

Re: Supporting armel/armhf in wheezy-lts

2016-04-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > In the mean time, the sponsor clarified that they will join as "gold > sponsor" so they are effectively sponsoring 8 hours of work per month, > which seems to be enough to cover for the increased work that those > ports might represent. The sponsorship