squeeze update of mono?

Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze version of mono: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-0689 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined

squeeze update of librsvg?

Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze version of librsvg: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7557 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7558 Would you like to take care of this y

squeeze update of tiff?

Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze version of tiff: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7554 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8665 https://security-tracker.debian.org/track

squeeze update of claws-mail?

Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze version of claws-mail: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8614 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have de

squeeze update of macopix?

Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze version of macopix: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8614 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have defin

squeeze update of giflib?

Hello dear maintainer(s), the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze version of giflib: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-7555 Would you like to take care of this yourself? If yes, please follow the workflow we have define

squeeze/wheezy updates of Redmine (+ long term state of redmine packaging)

Hello dear maintainers of the Redmine packages! The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are currently open in the Squeeze or Wheezy versions of redmine: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8537 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-8477 http

long-term redmine debian packaging

Hi! ["out of date redmine" bug report in CC. this is a followup email to the generic "we're going to LTS redmine!" notification which expands on the situation and hopefully the future of the Redmine packaging] I am trying to figure out how to maintain Redmine in the long term, especially in the o

Re: diff for passenger in Squeeze

On 2015-12-29 07:36:30, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > > Isn't the logic reversed here? We want so _skip_ the header if it > containsNonAlphaNumDash not add it? After reviewing the patch, I agree, the logic is reversed. I am also not sure why the patch is so different - did the primitives

Re: diff for passenger in Squeeze

Hi Thorsten, On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:13:32PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi everybody, > > can someone please have a look at the diff for passenger=2.2.11debian-2 in > Squeeze that should solve CVE-2015-7519[1] and nod? > > Thanks! > Thorsten > > > [1] https://security-tracker.debian.