Re: Bug#789037: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 13:50 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > On Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > >> We have got problems with the new version on all of our vSphere 5.1/5.5 > > >> VMs and dedicated hosts. > > >> It looks like our xen VMs are not affected. Here some s

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

Hi, I’ve updated my debian squeeze LTS servers to the 2.6.32-48squeeze12 kernel this morning. Since I did this update, I’ve got a lot of Kernel Oops message in the kernel.log like those ones : Jun 17 13:10:59 catcher3 kernel: [ 3109.205416] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derefere

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

Hi Patrick, On Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> We have got problems with the new version on all of our vSphere 5.1/5.5 > >> VMs and dedicated hosts. > >> It looks like our xen VMs are not affected. Here some snips of dmesg: > > to confirm #789037 - you've only seen this on 32b

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

Am 17.06.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Holger Levsen: Hi Patrick, On Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015, Patrick Matthäi wrote: We have got problems with the new version on all of our vSphere 5.1/5.5 VMs and dedicated hosts. It looks like our xen VMs are not affected. Here some snips of dmesg: to confirm #789037

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

Hi Patrick, On Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2015, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > We have got problems with the new version on all of our vSphere 5.1/5.5 > VMs and dedicated hosts. > It looks like our xen VMs are not affected. Here some snips of dmesg: to confirm #789037 - you've only seen this on 32bit archs (i3

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

Am 17.06.2015 um 09:52 schrieb Jan Ingvoldstad: On 06/17/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Hello, [please CC me, I am not subscribed to this list] We have got problems with the new version on all of our vSphere 5.1/5.5 VMs and dedicated hosts. It looks like our xen VMs are not affected. H

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

On 06/17/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Hello, [please CC me, I am not subscribed to this list] We have got problems with the new version on all of our vSphere 5.1/5.5 VMs and dedicated hosts. It looks like our xen VMs are not affected. Here some snips of dmesg: This is the same problem

Re: squeeze update of qemu?

Hi, On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:53:00PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hello, > > The VENOM vulnerability is unfixed in squeeze (except for > squeeze-backports): > > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-3456 > > Even though qemu is not supported in squeeze-lts, I propose to fix thi

Re: Accepted linux-2.6 2.6.32-48squeeze12 (all source) into squeeze-lts

Hello, [please CC me, I am not subscribed to this list] We have got problems with the new version on all of our vSphere 5.1/5.5 VMs and dedicated hosts. It looks like our xen VMs are not affected. Here some snips of dmesg: vSphere: [ 2930.793524] [] ? inet_release+0x4e/0x54 [ 2930.793641] []