Hi,
On Samstag, 4. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
> Are they still needed?
No.
> Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?
No.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
On 2014-10-04 11:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
What about squeeze-updates (formerly volatile)?
Are they still needed?
Are security fixes applied to packages in squeeze or squeeze-updates?
That question doesn't make sense. squeeze-updates is a strict subset of
squeeze (technically squeeze+o
On Dienstag, 17. Juni 2014, Evgeni Golov wrote:
No, please *extend* the list. Not replace it.
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using
If you remove squeeze and/or squeeze security, dependencies will become
unresolvable.
On 03.10.14 15:42, Holger Levsen wrote:
squeeze-security isn't needed, the last
Hi,
On Samstag, 4. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >btw, installing the debian-security-support package would also have told
> >you that these packages are not supported anymore. :-)
> I do have that one. well unfortunately it's not in wheezy yet.
there is a backport in wheezy-backp
>On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> there are still packages that seem to be part of security updates, like
>> bugzilla3 and openswan
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openswan
On 03.10.14 16:48, Holger Levsen wrote:
oh, you found a bug in the archive: opens
