Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:27:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#758838: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #750388,
regarding make lxc support more descriptive
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:27:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#758838: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #673636,
regarding support smart network defaults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
live-debconfig | 4.0~alpha35-1 | source, all
live-debconfig-doc | 4.0~alpha35-1 | all
--- Reason ---
RoM
--
Not
Version: 4.0~alpha35-1+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package live-debconfig has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/
having though about this again, i think we should do two things:
* keep the Packages helper as is - it's a 'stupid' tool that just
does exactly what told: trying to install all packages matching a
certain criteria without exception/automagics etc.
* either, directly use tasksel to ins
On 08/18/2014 12:33 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> 1. The i386 image includes 486 & 686-pae kernels, but only one boot
> entry that claims to be 486, but really is 686-pae (if you need to boot
> the 486 kernel, edit the syslinux commandline to replace the vmlinuz and
> initrd.img to suffix them with th
Hi,
having looked at our official live-images configurations, i think we
should enforce to not build any official images if there's no task in
tasksel for it.
currently all the desktop and the standard image correspond to one or
more tasksel task(s) except for the rescue flavour.
does anyone vol
Greetings,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:46 AM, wrote:
> I started two builds but both ended with status 'maybe-failed' and ISO
> file is not produced:
> http://cgi.build.live-systems.org/build/20140821.130938.270493711/
> http://cgi.build.live-systems.org/build/20140821.144237.312095495/
> Can yo
On 22/08/14 12:24 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> having though about this again, i think we should do two things:
>
> * keep the Packages helper as is - it's a 'stupid' tool that just
> does exactly what told: trying to install all packages matching a
> certain criteria without exception/aut
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Richard Nelson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:46 AM, wrote:
>>
>> I started two builds but both ended with status 'maybe-failed' and ISO
>> file is not produced:
>> http://cgi.build.live-systems.org/build/20140821.130938.270493711/
>> http://
It's true, I tried to build sid, I did not know that it was
impossible.
But now I tried to build jessie and I got the same
error:
http://cgi.build.live-systems.org/build/20140822.214850.387890629/
[7]
I want to test Debian Live on my Dell XPS 12, I already tried
latest wheezy 7.6.0 Live CD with
If you want to build a simple one, here are the basics:
Ensure you have the live-build prerequisites met\installed.
mkdir
cd
lb init
lb config
Next, modify the following files and replace your current system build
with jessie:
./config/bootstrap:LB_DISTRIBUTION="jessie"
./config/bootstrap:L
El 22/08/14 17:35, Daniel Baumann escribió:
Hi,
having looked at our official live-images configurations, i think we
should enforce to not build any official images if there's no task in
tasksel for it.
currently all the desktop and the standard image correspond to one or
more tasksel task(s) e
As far as I know it is not and has not been possible to build Sid or Jessie
on the online builder for at least a year and a half.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Zed wrote:
> If you want to build a simple one, here are the basics:
>
> Ensure you have the live-build prerequisites met\installed
Greetings,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Crissman wrote:
> As far as I know it is not and has not been possible to build Sid or
> Jessie on the online builder for at least a year and a half.
>
According to log files on the build server, the last good jessie build was:
[14/Jul/2014:21:
On 08/22/2014 10:19 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> my vote would be with tasksel unless there's some blocker
obviously, yes; will see what the reason was last time we deliberatly
didn't use tasksel.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@prog
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:06 AM, wrote:
> It's true, I tried to build sid, I did not know that it was impossible.
> But now I tried to build jessie and I got the same error:
>
Reading the log I saw the problem "E: Package 'plymouth-drm' has no
installation candidate". The plymouth-drm package i
On 08/23/2014 02:16 AM, adrian15 wrote:
> A rescue task for tasksel means having a metapackage like:
> task-lxde-desktop
> but being named as: task-rescue ?
yes (or whatever the tasksel maintainers would name it).
> If my assumption is right, do we have the list of rescue packages that
> will be
On 08/23/2014 07:46 AM, chals wrote:
> So, once this change reaches the online builder it will be possible to
> build jessie images again, hopefully :)
that should be as of now the case.
> (I do not know which branch the online builder clones, if it is the
> debian one, you'll have to wait until
live-images_4.0~alpha26-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-images_4.0~alpha26-1_all.deb
live-image-gnome-desktop_4.0~alpha26-1_all.deb
live-image-kde-desktop_4.0~alpha26-1_all.deb
live-image-lxde-desktop_4.0~alpha26-1_all.deb
live-image-mate-desk
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 08:22:25 +0200
Source: live-images
Binary: live-images live-image-gnome-desktop live-image-kde-desktop
live-image-lxde-desktop live-image-mate-desktop live-image-rescue
live-image-standard live-image-xf
21 matches
Mail list logo
