Hi,
Armin Krezović wrote (03 Aug 2011 11:56:51 GMT) :
> When there are multiple kernels, there remain /vmlinuz.old
> and /initrd.img.old on chroot, so I attach another proposed patch to
> clean those files.
It seems to me any Debian system with >1 kernel installed has those
symlinks, so I'd like
Package: live-build
Version: 3.0~a21-1
Severity: normal
You might want a script like this in the binary_local-hooks.
#!/bin/bash
cd binary/live || exit 1
vmlinuz=$(ls vmlinuz* | tail -n1)
ln $vmlinuz vmlinuz || true
initrd=$(ls initrd.img* | tail -n1)
ln $initrd initrd.img || true
--
To UN
On 07/28/2011 03:03 PM, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
The main question is also do we really want to support all these
scripts?
if possible, yes.
I really don't think it is wortwhile to be able to use findiso
for example on a crypted disk/nbd.
live-boot should support as many options to boot, in any
On 08/02/2011 11:21 PM, intrigeri wrote:
=> I'd better add a few kB to the initramfs and get clean, robust and
maintainable code.
ack.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.p
On 07/26/2011 11:32 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
01_fix_output_file.patch
applied, thanks.
07_support_findiso.patch
misses manpage entry, and please do the silencing of the umount call in
a seperate commit/patch, so that it can (if needed) reverted
independently from the fromiso thing.
10
On 07/26/2011 11:32 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
once again a patch bomb by the Grml project.
oh, and in general.. i'd appreciate if you could update patches so that
they have a proper name of the author in it ($Firstname $Lastname
<$email>), plus description (short one line, multiple additional
tag 636208 pending
thanks
fixed in git.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.deb
retitle 636217 should embedd syslinux-themes in live-build
thanks
that will not help, the right thing is, like discussed on irc a few days
ago, to embedd s-t-debian in live-build.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technolo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 636208 pending
Bug #636208 [live-build] live-build: lb config fails without any diagnostic
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
636208: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 636217 should embedd syslinux-themes in live-build
Bug #636217 [live-build] live-build: initrd/vmlinuz filenames and syslinux menu
entries do not match, can't boot the live image
Changed Bug title to 'should embedd syslinux-themes in live
tag 636489 moreinfo
thanks
On 08/04/2011 01:01 PM, intrigeri wrote:
It seems to me any Debian system with>1 kernel installed has those
symlinks, so I'd like to be explained what the advantage of removing
those in Live systems would be.
aol
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 636489 moreinfo
Bug #636489 [live-build] live-build: Add some extra cleaning
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
636489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6364
retitle 636440 update apt-file cache
tag 636440 - patch
tag 636440 - upstream
tag 636440 pending
thanks
rather than updating apt-file unconditionally if it's installed, and
thus considerably increasing the filesystem size, this should like all
the other hooks to regenerate indices be optional (
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 636440 update apt-file cache
Bug #636440 [live-build] live-build: Regenerate apt-file cache
Changed Bug title to 'update apt-file cache' from 'live-build: Regenerate
apt-file cache'
> tag 636440 - patch
Bug #636440 [live-build] update apt
* Daniel Baumann wrote [04.08.11 21:17]:
Hi,
>> 16_nodhcp.patch
>
> who uses NODHCPHOSTNAME? i couldn't find any reference in live-boot nor
> initramfs-tools that makes use of this variable.
Hm? There is no NODHCPHOSTNAME in
http://git.grml.org/?p=live-boot-grml.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/16_
On 08/04/2011 09:54 PM, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
Hm? There is no NODHCPHOSTNAME in
http://git.grml.org/?p=live-boot-grml.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/16_nodhcp.patch
indeed, my fault.. i accidentally looked at 11_dhcphostname.patch
instead of 16_nodhcp.patch in the checkout of the sources. sorry.
* Daniel Baumann wrote [04.08.11 22:14]:
> On 08/04/2011 09:54 PM, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
>> Hm? There is no NODHCPHOSTNAME in
>> http://git.grml.org/?p=live-boot-grml.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/16_nodhcp.patch
>
> indeed, my fault.. i accidentally looked at 11_dhcphostname.patch
> instead of 16_n
On 4 August 2011 22:59, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
> * Daniel Baumann wrote [04.08.11 22:14]:
>> On 08/04/2011 09:54 PM, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
>>> Hm? There is no NODHCPHOSTNAME in
>>> http://git.grml.org/?p=live-boot-grml.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/16_nodhcp.patch
>>
>> indeed, my fault.. i accidentall
Hello
On 4 August 2011 21:17, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 11:32 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
>
>> 30_support_multiarch_dns.patch
>
> i'll wait for that on comments from Michal.
>
I propose to add this code to to initramfs-hooks to handle nss modules
and similar ( http://paste.debian.net/
Hi,
for the past few days i have been trying to build a live iso for the
vanillux project and i could use some hints :) i am using a script to
build the iso this way we can recreate iso's later easilly. the
important part and what dosent work is this the config ($1 is the
achitecture i386|amd64):
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Daniel Baumann <
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> tag 636489 moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> On 08/04/2011 01:01 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>
>> It seems to me any Debian system with>1 kernel installed has those
>> symlinks, so I'd like to be explained what the
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 08:00:38 +0200
with message-id <4e3b8706.80...@progress-technologies.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#636489: live-build: Add some extra cleaning
has caused the Debian Bug report #636489,
regarding live-build: Add some extra cleaning
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#586929: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #586929,
regarding packages not cached on failed build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#607225: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607225,
regarding include mdadm as extra package in binary_debian-installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#627332: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #627332,
regarding hook to update mlocate database
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#627716: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #627716,
regarding hook to update apt-xapian index
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630088: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630088,
regarding hook to remove gnome icon cache
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#631281: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #631281,
regarding hook to remove pyc files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633052: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #633052,
regarding live-build: Please add support for /run
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633356: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #633356,
regarding live-build: use LB_APT_SECURE too when bootstrapping system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#636208: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #636208,
regarding live-build: lb config fails without any diagnostic
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:17:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#636440: fixed in live-build 3.0~a26-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #636440,
regarding update apt-file cache
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
live-config_3.0~a24-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-config_3.0~a24-1.dsc
live-config_3.0~a24.orig.tar.gz
live-config_3.0~a24-1.debian.tar.gz
live-config_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
live-config-doc_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
live-config-runit_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
live-boot_3.0~a20-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-boot_3.0~a20-1.dsc
live-boot_3.0~a20.orig.tar.gz
live-boot_3.0~a20-1.debian.tar.gz
live-boot_3.0~a20-1_all.deb
live-boot-doc_3.0~a20-1_all.deb
live-boot-initramfs-tools_3.0~a20-1_all.deb
Gree
live-build_3.0~a26-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-build_3.0~a26-1.dsc
live-build_3.0~a26.orig.tar.gz
live-build_3.0~a26-1.debian.tar.gz
live-build_3.0~a26-1_all.deb
live-build-cgi_3.0~a26-1_all.deb
live-build-cron_3.0~a26-1_all.deb
Greeting
Accepted:
live-boot-doc_3.0~a20-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-boot/live-boot-doc_3.0~a20-1_all.deb
live-boot-initramfs-tools_3.0~a20-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-boot/live-boot-initramfs-tools_3.0~a20-1_all.deb
live-boot_3.0~a20-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/l/live-boot/live-boot_3.0~a20-1.debian.tar.gz
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
live-boot-doc_3.0~a20-1_all.deb: package says section is doc, override says
misc.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, f
Accepted:
live-build-cgi_3.0~a26-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-build/live-build-cgi_3.0~a26-1_all.deb
live-build-cron_3.0~a26-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-build/live-build-cron_3.0~a26-1_all.deb
live-build_3.0~a26-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/l/live-build/live-build_3.0~a26-1.debian.tar.gz
live-build_3.
Accepted:
live-config-doc_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-config/live-config-doc_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
live-config-runit_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-config/live-config-runit_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
live-config-systemd_3.0~a24-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-config/live-config-systemd_3.0~a24-1_all.de
On 08/05/2011 12:57 AM, fabrice quenneville wrote:
> --package-lists ../vanillux.list \
this will not work, copy you package list into
config/package-lists/foo.chroot.list.
> --debian-installer-distribution wheezy \
this will fail if your derivative doesn't ship d-i indices.
> so i am wondering
On 08/03/2011 02:09 AM, promo...@googlemail.com wrote:
> I try to boot Tails 0.7.2 (http://tails.boum.org/) which is based on Debian,
> and experience the
> following problem:
eventhough tails is based on debian-live, we can't support that here as
we don't know the details about it necessary to
41 matches
Mail list logo
