On 07/18/2011 08:59 PM, Jacob Alman wrote:
> I’m cloning a Mac, and clonezilla reads as unable to find a medium
> containing a live file system.
eventhough clonezilla is based on debian-live, we haven't build that
image and don't know it, so we can't really help you with it. it is best
you ask the
On 07/16/2011 10:39 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote:
> The packages needed for improved font rendering are only
> libcairo2 and libxft2.
what changes did you apply to the two packages exactely? do you know why
the changes are not included in the vanilla debian packages?
--
Address:Daniel Bauman
tag 627332 pending
tag 627716 pending
tag 630088 pending
tag 631281 pending
tag 633356 pending
thanks
fixed in git.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 627332 pending
Bug #627332 [live-build] hook to update mlocate database
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 627716 pending
Bug #627716 [live-build] hook to update apt-xapian index
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 630088 pending
Bug #630088 [live-build] hoo
tag 633052 pending
thanks
fixed in git.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 633052 pending
Bug #633052 [src:live-build] live-build: Please add support for /run
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
633052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Hello
On 19 July 2011 09:59, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 07/16/2011 10:39 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote:
>> The packages needed for improved font rendering are only
>> libcairo2 and libxft2.
>
> what changes did you apply to the two packages exactely? do you know why
> the changes are not included in t
On 11-07-19 04:25 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 19 July 2011 09:59, Daniel Bamann
what changes did you apply to the two packages exactely? do you know why
the changes are not included in the vanilla debian packages?
As I understand it these are just from Wheezy, not patched.
So these are in D
tag 586929 pending
thanks
fixed in git.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 586929 pending
Bug #586929 [live-build] packages not cached on failed build
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586929: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586929
On 07/19/2011 11:02 AM, Daniel Ellison wrote:
>> As I understand it these are just from Wheezy, not patched.
this is what confused me..
Daniel links in
http://journal.syrinxos.com/post/6789632136/fonts-more-important-than-you-might-think
to
https://sites.google.com/site/quanli/davidturner%27slcdc
On 14 July 2011 20:14, Daniel Ellison wrote:
> On 11-07-14 01:06 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
>>>
>>> Does that sound like the behaviour expected from archive issues?
>>
>> More like a completely broken archive mirror (or broken apt caching
>> proxy).
>
> I was using:
>
> --mirror-bootstrap http://
On 11-07-19 06:48 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 14 July 2011 20:14, Daniel Ellison wrote:
If I can't figure this out soon, I might skip the i386 build for now and
concentrate on getting the source to a public repository, setting up a bug
tracker, website, etc.
Note that this might be a depend
On 11-07-19 05:25 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/19/2011 11:02 AM, Daniel Ellison wrote:
As I understand it these are just from Wheezy, not patched.
this is what confused me..
Daniel links in
http://journal.syrinxos.com/post/6789632136/fonts-more-important-than-you-might-think
to
https://sit
On 07/19/2011 01:49 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote:
> Yes, in theory that is all you should need to do. It's easy to test:
> just drop my .fonts.conf in your home directory and log out/in. If you
> try it, please let me know how it goes.
will do, but after debconf (means, not until the first week of aug
On 11-07-19 10:41 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/19/2011 01:49 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote:
Yes, in theory that is all you should need to do. It's easy to test:
just drop my .fonts.conf in your home directory and log out/in. If you
try it, please let me know how it goes.
will do, but after debco
Hello,
As described on Daniel's blog[1], a regression was introduced into
live-build that caused the usb images created by live-build to be corrupted.
I've determined that the corruption was caused by live-build modifying flags
in the partition table while the image is still mounted with an offse
Hello,
Please accept this patch which updates lb_binary_linux-image to only copy
over kernel and initrd if LB_LINUX_PACKAGES doesn't equal 'none'. This patch
will fix build failures caused by live-build attempting to copy over kernel
and initrd which don't exist for builds that are configured not
Hello,
Please accept attached patch to remove calls to chown chroot and binary
directories during build process if LB_ROOT_COMMAND is set as chown will
strip the setsuid bit (which breaks a lot of stuff naturally).
Cheers,
--
Cody A.W. Somerville
Release Engineer
Foundations Team
Custom Engine
Hello,
Please accept this patch which will append 'linux32' to LB_ROOT_COMMAND if
'uname -m' is x86_64 and LB_ARCHITECTURE is i386. This fixes build failures
due to dkms module makefiles relying on uname -m to determine which linux
kernel headers to use.
Cheers,
--
Cody A.W. Somerville
Release
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville <
cody.somervi...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please accept attached patch to remove calls to chown chroot and binary
> directories during build process if LB_ROOT_COMMAND is set as chown will
> strip the setsuid bit (which breaks a lot
On 07/19/2011 09:29 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> Please accept this patch which updates the lb_binary_usb
> helper to modify the flags with a properly configured loop mount as well
> as apply the fix that caused the regression to lb_source_usb (but
> without the problem fixed here of course).
On 07/19/2011 09:39 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> Please accept this patch which updates lb_binary_linux-image to only
> copy over kernel and initrd if LB_LINUX_PACKAGES doesn't equal 'none'.
applied, thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
On 07/19/2011 10:15 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> Please accept this patch which will append 'linux32' to LB_ROOT_COMMAND
> if 'uname -m' is x86_64 and LB_ARCHITECTURE is i386.
appart from the typo ('&' instead of '&&'), this should not just be done
in the case of i386 on amd64, but for any-3
24 matches
Mail list logo