Updated RFC: live-initramfs 2.x features

2010-01-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, I've summed up all the messages from the previous thread and sorted the list by priority: http://live.debian.net/devel/live-initramfs/features More feedback is of course welcome. In the beginning of the next week, I'll post some notes about starting the implementation. Regards, Daniel -- A

Processed: live-helper: should display progress

2010-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 566250 pending Bug #566250 [live-helper] live-helper: should display progress Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Processing of live-manual_20100101-1_i386.changes

2010-01-23 Thread Archive Administrator
live-manual_20100101-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: live-manual_20100101-1.dsc live-manual_20100101.orig.tar.gz live-manual_20100101-1.diff.gz live-manual_20100101-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.o

Bug#566250: live-helper: should display progress

2010-01-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
tag 566250 pending thanks fixed in git, thanks for reporting it. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#562114: marked as done (Customized chroot must be restored for numerous binary helpers to work)

2010-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:01:40 +0100 with message-id <4b5abaf4.1090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Customized chroot must be restored for numerous binary helpers to work has caused the Debian Bug report #562114, regarding Customized chroot must be restored for numerous binary he

live-manual_20100101-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-01-23 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: live-manual_20100101-1.diff.gz to main/l/live-manual/live-manual_20100101-1.diff.gz live-manual_20100101-1.dsc to main/l/live-manual/live-manual_20100101-1.dsc live-manual_20100101-1_all.deb to main/l/live-manual/live-manual_20100101-1_all.deb live-manual_20100101.orig.tar.gz t

Processing of live-helper_2.0~a5-1_i386.changes

2010-01-23 Thread Archive Administrator
live-helper_2.0~a5-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: live-helper_2.0~a5-1.dsc live-helper_2.0~a5.orig.tar.gz live-helper_2.0~a5-1.diff.gz live-helper_2.0~a5-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) --

live-helper_2.0~a5-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-01-23 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: live-helper_2.0~a5-1.diff.gz to main/l/live-helper/live-helper_2.0~a5-1.diff.gz live-helper_2.0~a5-1.dsc to main/l/live-helper/live-helper_2.0~a5-1.dsc live-helper_2.0~a5-1_all.deb to main/l/live-helper/live-helper_2.0~a5-1_all.deb live-helper_2.0~a5.orig.tar.gz to main/l/live-

Bug#566250: marked as done (live-helper: should display progress)

2010-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:40:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#566250: fixed in live-helper 2.0~a5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #566250, regarding live-helper: should display progress to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Re: test live-initramfs_1.157.4-2

2010-01-23 Thread joseangon
2010/1/22 Daniel Baumann Hola. joseangon wrote: > > > /dev/hda1: UUID="21ff00f5-25cc-4232-a773-1363042a29ed" SEC_TYPE="ext2" > > TYPE="ext3" > [...] > > /dev/hdb13: UUID="5dcce6ab-2096-4a6a-ad46-d57b4e5b83f6" SEC_TYPE="ext2" > > TYPE="ext3" > > those are all supported filesystems, so i don't se

aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-23 Thread Peter Daum
Hi, I am using live-helper for building a network-bootable system based on squeeze. The system the build process is running on uses lenny. Yesterday, "lh build" suddenly quit working - it aborts complaining about aufs-modules-2.6-686 missing. After some looking, I found bug report #562664, which

Re: aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
Peter Daum wrote: > The system the build process is running on uses lenny. > Yesterday, "lh build" suddenly quit working - it aborts complaining about > aufs-modules-2.6-686 missing. After some looking, I found bug report > #562664, > which sounded like my problem, and upgraded live-helper to the l

Re: aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 19:58:57 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > your problem is that the prebuilt aufs-modules-* packages were requested > to be removed to early by the kernel team. until 2.6.32 migrates to > squeeze, you cannot build squeeze images. in the meanwhile, just pin the > kernel package

Re: aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
Julien Cristau wrote: > 2.6.32 *is* in squeeze :) apparently since yesterday (and today on the mirrors), indeed. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-

Re: aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-23 Thread joseangon
2010/1/23 Daniel Baumann Hola. Julien Cristau wrote: > > 2.6.32 *is* in squeeze :) > > apparently since yesterday (and today on the mirrors), indeed. > > Since kernel 2.6.29, the aufs already included in the sources. It is not necessary to indicate in the config to be included as a module. Gr

Re: aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-23 Thread joseangon
2010/1/23 joseangon > > > 2010/1/23 Daniel Baumann > > Hola. > > > > Julien Cristau wrote: >> > 2.6.32 *is* in squeeze :) >> >> apparently since yesterday (and today on the mirrors), indeed. >> >> > Since kernel 2.6.29, the aufs already included in the sources. > > It is not necessary to indicat