Le 2017-07-24 17:53, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
Does it work well? We tried zsync for the installer images some time
ago, and it didn't work too well at the time and I disabled it
again. IIRC there were issues with the redirects and the setup we use
on cdimage.d.o (aka get.d.o)... See #444159
I'v
I can't speak about how debian's system of mirrors might affect zsync,
but for linuxcnc's images I've seen substantial savings with zsync,
typically 80-85% reduced data transfer when downloading the next .iso
image.
One thing I just discovered is that zsync apparently can't handle https:
URLs! :-
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 08:35:17AM +0200, igo...@free.fr wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there a reason for stretch not having zsync support?
>
>jessie had and still has:
>
>https://get.debian.org/images/archive/8.9.0-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/
>
> debian-live-8.9.0-amd64-standard.iso.zsync2017-07-23 15:
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator
should fix this against automated addresses collectors.
El 24/07/17 a les 08:35, igo...@free.fr ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason for stretc
Hi,
Is there a reason for stretch not having zsync support?
jessie had and still has:
https://get.debian.org/images/archive/8.9.0-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/
debian-live-8.9.0-amd64-standard.iso.zsync2017-07-23 15:04
1.4M
It saves bandwidth!
Anyway, thanks!
--
igor
