On Sunday 18 May 2014 21:34:02 Richard Nelson wrote:
> The field param was designed to be utilized as suggested, but due to
> potential legal issues it has been set to read only so that only main is
> included. The potential for legal issues have been discussed before and
> there appear to be some
Greetings,
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Jeff Crissman wrote:
> It is impossible to add anything to that field.
>
> Why is it even there ?
>
>
The field param was designed to be utilized as suggested, but due to
potential legal issues it has been set to read only so that only main is
included
On Saturday 17 May 2014 12:44:19 Jeff Crissman wrote:
> It is impossible to add anything to that field.
>
> Why is it even there ?
Good point!
--
GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
It is impossible to add anything to that field.
Why is it even there ?
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 17 May 2014 20:51:20 Raya Bodnaru wrote:
> > unfortunately, my build failed, and here is the log:
> > http://cgi.build.live-systems.org/build/20140517.1
On Saturday 17 May 2014 20:51:20 Raya Bodnaru wrote:
> unfortunately, my build failed, and here is the log:
> http://cgi.build.live-systems.org/build/20140517.162650.799930192/log.
Did you specify 'non-free' in 'Advanced bootstrap options' (and then you'd
probably also want 'contrib' there)?
--
hello friends,
thank you for your service.
unfortunately, my build failed, and here is the log:
http://cgi.build.live-systems.org/build/20140517.162650.799930192/log.
but i found a reasonable archive.
thanks a lot,
alex
