On 02/12/2012 12:29 AM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> So in this case stable always wins from squeeze-backports.
absolutely. good catch (and yes, i must be blind myself :)
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Inter
On Saturday 11 February 2012 09:07:07 broletto wrote:
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=stable
> Pin-Priority: 1001
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=squeeze-backports
> Pin-Priority: 900
I'm not sure, but shouldn't you switch the Pin-Priority values, since higher
priority will 'win'
from a lower pri
Il 11/02/2012 09:34, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
On 02/11/2012 09:07 AM, broletto wrote:
Package: *
Pin: release a=squeeze-backports
Pin-Priority: 900
this will almost never work with the way backports.d.o is working,
individual backports are conflicting with each other and you can
therefore not
On 02/11/2012 09:07 AM, broletto wrote:
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=squeeze-backports
> Pin-Priority: 900
this will almost never work with the way backports.d.o is working,
individual backports are conflicting with each other and you can
therefore not use "squeeze plus all backports from backpor
hello list,
im looking for build a live with the latest updates present in backports.
To do this, i created a new file in the chroot_apt folder as
preferences, here is the detail:
Package: *
Pin: release a=stable
Pin-Priority: 1001
Package: *
Pin: release a=squeeze-backports
Pin-Priority: 900
