Michal Suchanek wrote:
> FWIW if the first alternative was always used what use for
> alternatives is there?
there's the following reproducable case:
1. you have neither iceweasel-l10n-de installed, nor any of
myspell-de-de, myspell-de-ch and myspell-de-at.
2. you have more packages installed
2009/1/15 Daniel Baumann :
> schoappied wrote:
>> Now I'm in doubt whether aptitude or apt-get is preferable for a mixed
>> testing/unstable system..
>
> i *personally* use apt-get only, i don't like aptitude.
>
> apart from that i've the impression that aptitude being slower, it has a
> very stran
schoappied wrote:
> Now I'm in doubt whether aptitude or apt-get is preferable for a mixed
> testing/unstable system..
i *personally* use apt-get only, i don't like aptitude.
apart from that i've the impression that aptitude being slower, it has a
very strange and allegedly not determinstic depen
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
There is a difference here. Aptitude cleans up the dependencies
automatically when you remove whatever needed them. Unfortunately,
neither tool seems to be configurable to do what the other does.
Messy.
apt can do that as well:
APT:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> There is a difference here. Aptitude cleans up the dependencies
> automatically when you remove whatever needed them. Unfortunately,
> neither tool seems to be configurable to do what the other does.
> Messy.
apt can do that as well:
APT::Get:AutomaticRemove "true
2009/1/15 Daniel Baumann :
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> AFAIK apt does not track manually installed packages at all, it makes
>> all packages it installs seem manually installed as it does not record
>> which were added automatically.
>
> apt does track manually installed packages since quite some t
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
AFAIK apt does not track manually installed packages at all, it makes
all packages it installs seem manually installed as it does not record
which were added automatically.
apt does track manually installed packages since quite some time (en
Daniel Baumann wrote:
schoappied wrote:
[...]
Setting up sun-java6-doc (6-07-4) ...
This package is an installer package, it does not actually contain the
JDK documentation. You will need to go download one of the
archives:
jdk-6-doc.zip jdk-6-doc-ja.zip
(choose the non-update version
schoappied wrote:
[...]
> Setting up sun-java6-doc (6-07-4) ...
> This package is an installer package, it does not actually contain the
> JDK documentation. You will need to go download one of the
> archives:
>
>jdk-6-doc.zip jdk-6-doc-ja.zip
>
> (choose the non-update version if this is t
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> AFAIK apt does not track manually installed packages at all, it makes
> all packages it installs seem manually installed as it does not record
> which were added automatically.
apt does track manually installed packages since quite some time (end
lets you cleanup unused, a
Daniel Baumann wrote:
schoappied wrote:
Is there is solution for this?
/usr/share/live-helper/examples/hooks/sun-java6.sh
I got these errors:
he following NEW packages will be installed:
libxp6 odbcinst1debian1 sun-java6-bin sun-java6-demo sun-java6-doc
sun-java6-fonts sun-java
2009/1/14 Daniel Baumann :
> schoappied wrote:
>> One note.. the tools use apt-get by default... I use aptitude,
>
> because apt-get is saner than aptitude and has less bugs.
>
>> I think I should change those to aptitude right?
>
> probably, i don't know if apt-get and aptitude use the same data
schoappied wrote:
> One note.. the tools use apt-get by default... I use aptitude,
because apt-get is saner than aptitude and has less bugs.
> I think I should change those to aptitude right?
probably, i don't know if apt-get and aptitude use the same data file in
order to track manual install
Daniel Baumann wrote:
schoappied wrote:
Is there is solution for this?
/usr/share/live-helper/examples/hooks/sun-java6.sh
Mmh interesting packages there...
I want to make a as easy as possible desktop for users. What is
recommend to install? What kind of drivers/ modules?
One
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:25:59 +0100
schoappied wrote:
> I am not able to include packages like sun-java-plugin and the
> msstcorefonts which requires to sign a license.
Instead of msttcorefonts, use ttf-liberation.
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
schoappied wrote:
> Is there is solution for this?
/usr/share/live-helper/examples/hooks/sun-java6.sh
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
Hi,
I am not able to include packages like sun-java-plugin and the
msstcorefonts which requires to sign a license.
sun-dlj-v1-1 license could not be presented
try 'dpkg-reconfigure debconf' to select a frontend other than
noninteractive
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/sun-ja
17 matches
Mail list logo
