Re: [PATCH] Fixed missing 'sh' in lh_chroot_sources

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > it's already done this way on a different occasion in the same script. > Without this, the user's shell is used, which might be missing in the > chroot. applied, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROT

[PATCH] Fixed missing 'sh' in lh_chroot_sources

From: Maximilian Gaß <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> it's already done this way on a different occasion in the same script. Without this, the user's shell is used, which might be missing in the chroot. --- helpers/lh_chroot_sources |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(

Re: lh_chroot_sources

T o n g wrote: > what does lh_chroot_sources do? did you read line 3 of /usr/bin/lh_chroot_sources? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCR

lh_chroot_sources

Hi, what does lh_chroot_sources do? didn't find it in lh_chroot and debian live wiki. please help. thanks -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Re: [PATCH] Always download APT package lists in lh_chroot_sources

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:18:40PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > however, the check in lh_chroot_sources against LH_PACKAGES_LISTS is > somewhat suboptimal, since it doesn't respect peoples choice of using a > regular package list but having set LH_BOOTSTRAP_FLAVOUR to minimal -

Re: [PATCH] Always download APT package lists in lh_chroot_sources

ds true. however, the check in lh_chroot_sources against LH_PACKAGES_LISTS is somewhat suboptimal, since it doesn't respect peoples choice of using a regular package list but having set LH_BOOTSTRAP_FLAVOUR to minimal - which is the only value of interest wrt/ to the apt-utils install pro

Re: [PATCH] Always download APT package lists in lh_chroot_sources

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 09:00:09PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Maximilian Gaß wrote: > > The check for specific package lists is too unflexible > > i don't think so. why do you think? I mentioned this on IRC. When I use a different package list than minimal or stripped, which I do, live-helper

Re: [PATCH] Always download APT package lists in lh_chroot_sources

Maximilian Gaß wrote: > The check for specific package lists is too unflexible i don't think so. why do you think? -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- T

[PATCH] Always download APT package lists in lh_chroot_sources

The check for specific package lists is too unflexible --- helpers/lh_chroot_sources |6 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/helpers/lh_chroot_sources b/helpers/lh_chroot_sources index 7ff87ac..de3a412 100755 --- a/helpers/lh_chroot_sources +++ b/helpers