-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear all,
I have create a RFH since I have currently no time due to personal issue
s:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963191
I hope somebody can help with the maintaining.
Best,
Jan
Am 26.05.20 um 16:33 schrieb Jan Luca Naumann
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:30:39PM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:10:10PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Adrian filed a rc bug in November 2019 which received no maintainer
> > > response, however the package was not autoremoved from testing due to
> > > aufs and aufs-
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:10:10PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Adrian filed a rc bug in November 2019 which received no maintainer
> > response, however the package was not autoremoved from testing due to aufs
> > and aufs-tools being considered a "key packages" due to high popcon. This
> > po
Dear Peter,
I am in general still active but due to private stuff I was quite bad
maintaining aufs the last months, I am really sorry. I will try to take
a look into the package at the weekend. Additionally, I will create a
RFH bug, maybe somebody wants to help me so there is no single point of
fa
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:18:48PM +0100, peter green wrote:
>...
> Adrian filed a rc bug in November 2019 which received no maintainer response,
> however the package was not autoremoved from testing due to aufs and
> aufs-tools being considered a "key packages" due to high popcon. This popcon
The aufs package last saw a maintainer upload in September 2019 and was
last-updated (by a NMU) in October 2019. It has had broken build-dependencies
in testing for half a year now (since Linux 5.3.9-3 migrated to testing in
November 2019).
According to dak rm the aufs source-package has two r
