> "Daniel" == Daniel Baumann
> writes:
> On 05/30/2011 02:24 PM, David Kuehling wrote:
>> Currently that support is broken. I already submitted a patch, but
>> nobody seems to care enough about that feature to merge it. If you
>> want to give it a try, have a look at the bug report:
>
On 05/30/2011 02:24 PM, David Kuehling wrote:
> Currently that support is broken. I already submitted a patch, but
> nobody seems to care enough about that feature to merge it. If you want
> to give it a try, have a look at the bug report:
nah, don't worry.. i've spend about an hour on the weeke
> "Juergen" == Juergen Fiedler writes:
> Hello, Right now, it looks like recent Sid images will not boot
> because the current kernel available in Sid (2.6.39-1) does not
> support aufs. I know there was an option for using unionfs instead of
> aufs, but that one seems to be dead for good.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Daniel Baumann <
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> On 05/28/2011 07:35 PM, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
>
>> Right now, it looks like recent Sid images will not boot because the
>> current kernel available in Sid (2.6.39-1) does not support aufs.
>>
>
>
On 05/28/2011 07:35 PM, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
Right now, it looks like recent Sid images will not boot because the
current kernel available in Sid (2.6.39-1) does not support aufs.
known, see #627837.
Does anybody have a workaround for that yet?
last week, i've uploaded fixed 2.6.39 images
Hello,
Right now, it looks like recent Sid images will not boot because the current
kernel available in Sid (2.6.39-1) does not support aufs.
I know there was an option for using unionfs instead of aufs, but that one
seems to be dead for good.
Does anybody have a workaround for that yet? I was thi
