Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31

2009-10-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 23:28 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > If you choose to unsubscribe from > > debian-kernel then don't complain that you don't hear what the kernel > > team is doing. > > wrong; i complain because the kernel team is apparently not > communicating to othe

Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31

2009-10-18 Thread Daniel Baumann
Ben Hutchings wrote: > If you choose to unsubscribe from > debian-kernel then don't complain that you don't hear what the kernel > team is doing. wrong; i complain because the kernel team is apparently not communicating to other teams about stuff that is critical for them. if you maintain such a c

Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31

2009-10-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 22:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> where was this discussed? > > > > Bug report #517130 > > which is one single message, not a discussion. > > > and the Debian kernel team meeting in Portland. > > in private then, behind 'closed doors'. :/ It w

Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31

2009-10-18 Thread Daniel Baumann
Ben Hutchings wrote: >> where was this discussed? > > Bug report #517130 which is one single message, not a discussion. > and the Debian kernel team meeting in Portland. in private then, behind 'closed doors'. :/ >> how will be binary modules provided in the future? > > In general they should

Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31

2009-10-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 21:55 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I'll be requesting removal of > > linux-modules-extra-2.6 rather than updating it. > > where was this discussed? Bug report #517130 and the Debian kernel team meeting in Portland. > how will be binary modules pro

Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31

2009-10-18 Thread maximilian attems
[snipping crosspost to d-release ] On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:55:16PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I'll be requesting removal of > > linux-modules-extra-2.6 rather than updating it. > > where was this discussed? how will be binary modules provided in the > future? why w

Re: Status of Linux 2.6.31

2009-10-18 Thread Daniel Baumann
Ben Hutchings wrote: > I'll be requesting removal of > linux-modules-extra-2.6 rather than updating it. where was this discussed? how will be binary modules provided in the future? why was debian-live not informed about it, it's critical part of the distribution for building live images. -- Addr