Re: Is live-boot-initramfs-tools multi-layer ready

2010-10-01 Thread Marco Amadori
In data venerdì 1 ottobre 2010 16:25:20, T o n g ha scritto: > On reading your message again, I realized that don't quite understand > what you mean by "the image can't be installed" because I doesn't have > live-installer installed and I can't find a man page for that either. > Did you mean some

Re: Is live-boot-initramfs-tools multi-layer ready

2010-10-01 Thread T o n g
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:54:50 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: >> Hope that someday live-build can build multiple layers too. It's >> nothing fancy/special for the 2nd layer and up, just chroot >> intall/config, that's it. > > the proble is not creating the multiple layers, but . . . > > unless some

Re: Is live-boot-initramfs-tools multi-layer ready

2010-09-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 09/29/2010 12:29 AM, T o n g wrote: > Hope that someday live-build can build multiple layers too. It's > nothing fancy/special for the 2nd layer and up, just chroot intall/config, > that's it. the proble is not creating the multiple layers, but: * how to let the user define in a sane way w

Re: Is live-boot-initramfs-tools multi-layer ready

2010-09-28 Thread T o n g
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:43:24 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote: >> In case for squashfs, it should be =rr+wh > > Yes, it makes sense, I will apply after doing some tests. Thanks a lot Marco. BTW, Hope that someday live-build can build multiple layers too. It's nothing fancy/special for the 2nd layer

Re: Is live-boot-initramfs-tools multi-layer ready

2010-09-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 09/28/2010 03:10 AM, T o n g wrote: > Please investigate. please sent patch? *scnr -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Is live-boot-initramfs-tools multi-layer ready

2010-09-27 Thread Marco Amadori
In data martedì 28 settembre 2010 03:10:26, T o n g ha scritto: > | wh: Readonly branch and it has/might have whiteouts on it. Aufs > | never issue write operation to this branch, but lookup for > | whiteout. Use this as ’=ro+wh’. > In case for squashfs, it should be =rr+wh Yes, it makes sense,

Re: Is live-boot-initramfs-tools multi-layer ready

2010-09-27 Thread T o n g
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:10:26 +, T o n g wrote: > Why layers are built one on top of another I meant *when*... -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.