On 20/10/14 04:14 AM, adrian15 wrote:
> El 23/08/14 18:23, Daniel Baumann escribió:
>> On 08/23/2014 06:20 PM, adrian15 wrote:
>>> Ok, I'll try to do my best. I have been impressed because there are way
>>> many more rescue packages on these two lists than what I had thought of
>>> originally.
>>
>
El 23/08/14 18:23, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 08/23/2014 06:20 PM, adrian15 wrote:
Ok, I'll try to do my best. I have been impressed because there are way
many more rescue packages on these two lists than what I had thought of
originally.
that would be great, thank you very much.
The articl
On 30 August 2014 02:42, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> On 08/30/2014 12:01 AM, Jeff Crissman wrote:
>> The "rescue" type disc is not usually installed, but rather used live to
>> repair an installed OS.
>> As such it fits the Debian Live project better than the conventional
>> install type approach of t
On 08/30/2014 12:01 AM, Jeff Crissman wrote:
> The "rescue" type disc is not usually installed, but rather used live to
> repair an installed OS.
> As such it fits the Debian Live project better than the conventional
> install type approach of the main Debian branch.
not really, let me explain why
The "rescue" type disc is not usually installed, but rather used live to
repair an installed OS.
As such it fits the Debian Live project better than the conventional
install type approach of the main Debian branch.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Ben Armstrong
wrote:
> On 24/08/14 02:54 PM, H
On 24/08/14 02:54 PM, Harshad Joshi wrote:
>
> The rescue disk is quite good. Don't kill it.
>
The idea is not to kill it, but to ensure it is backed by the project.
Its absence from tasksel is indication this is not a "thing" Debian
currently expects users to select when they install Debian. If i
The rescue disk is quite good. Don't kill it.
--sent from mobile--
हर्षद जोशी
On 23-Aug-2014 10:09 PM, "Daniel Baumann" <
daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> On 08/23/2014 06:20 PM, adrian15 wrote:
> > Ok, I'll try to do my best. I have been impressed because there are way
> > many
On 08/23/2014 06:20 PM, adrian15 wrote:
> Ok, I'll try to do my best. I have been impressed because there are way
> many more rescue packages on these two lists than what I had thought of
> originally.
that would be great, thank you very much.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3,
El 23/08/14 07:57, Daniel Baumann escribió:
On 08/23/2014 02:16 AM, adrian15 wrote:
A rescue task for tasksel means having a metapackage like:
task-lxde-desktop
but being named as: task-rescue ?
yes (or whatever the tasksel maintainers would name it).
Great.
If my assumption is right, do w
On 08/23/2014 02:16 AM, adrian15 wrote:
> A rescue task for tasksel means having a metapackage like:
> task-lxde-desktop
> but being named as: task-rescue ?
yes (or whatever the tasksel maintainers would name it).
> If my assumption is right, do we have the list of rescue packages that
> will be
El 22/08/14 17:35, Daniel Baumann escribió:
Hi,
having looked at our official live-images configurations, i think we
should enforce to not build any official images if there's no task in
tasksel for it.
currently all the desktop and the standard image correspond to one or
more tasksel task(s) e
Hi,
having looked at our official live-images configurations, i think we
should enforce to not build any official images if there's no task in
tasksel for it.
currently all the desktop and the standard image correspond to one or
more tasksel task(s) except for the rescue flavour.
does anyone vol
12 matches
Mail list logo
