Hi,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
> You might also consider not hard-coding the path at all, and simply rely
> on PATH being set properly. This should be a safe assumption, especially
> since the binary is now in /bin
The path is not hardcoded anywhere, except in the place where we wa
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:42:37 +0100 bi...@debian.org wrote:
> According to codesearch [1] your package live-boot does hard-code the
> udevadm path as /sbin/udevadm.
>
> Please change that to /bin/udevadm.
You might also consider not hard-coding the path at all, and simply rely
on PATH being set pr
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:42:37 +0100 bi...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: live-boot
> Version: 1:20170112
> Severity: normal
> User: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: udevadm
>
> Hi,
>
> since Jessie, the udevadm binary is available as /bin/udevadm.
> To not break existing s
Package: live-boot
Version: 1:20170112
Severity: normal
User: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: udevadm
Hi,
since Jessie, the udevadm binary is available as /bin/udevadm.
To not break existing scripts, which use the old /sbin/udevadm path,
the udev package currently ships