On 24/02/14 07:19 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 07:25 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>> It seems that 'lb clean' does more than just leave the .debs
>> available for reuse
>
> it doesn't.
>
> (and if having gnuplot in /var/cache/apt/ within the chroot during the
> time the packages get i
On 02/24/2014 07:25 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> It seems that 'lb clean' does more than just leave the .debs
> available for reuse
it doesn't.
(and if having gnuplot in /var/cache/apt/ within the chroot during the
time the packages get installed, then that is a bug in apt, and
working around it
Futher analysis shows that the gnuplot issue (and also an issue in
getting a package only specified in the list that has no reverse
dependencies to *not* be installed by removing from package lists --
removing a package from the package list and doing lb clean is
insufficient) is a result of 'lb cl
