On 05/29/2010 10:08 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Seems fair. How about 'noroot', since this effectively makes the root
> account unusable?
that sounds good to me. thanks!
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@pant
Le vendredi 28 mai 2010 à 21:45 +0200, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> On 05/28/2010 11:08 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Since people are usually not aware of how PolicyKit works, I think it
> > would be better to disable both sudo and PK with the same command-line
> > argument.
>
> right, but not wi
On 05/28/2010 11:08 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Since people are usually not aware of how PolicyKit works, I think it
> would be better to disable both sudo and PK with the same command-line
> argument.
right, but not with 'nosudo'. nosudo implies (at least for me), to
disable sudo, not anything
On 05/28/2010 09:51 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> on a side note: it's a bit inconvenient to have to specify positively
> all wanted scripts, when you just want to disable one. that's why i'm
> going to add the negative ones too, so you could use something like
> live-noconfig=foo.
done in git.
--
tag 583533 pending
thanks
Hi,
thanks for your patch, however, this is not required anymore in
live-config. If you don't want policykit to be present anymore, you can
avoid the scripts to be run (see man live-config).
on a side note: it's a bit inconvenient to have to specify positively
all wante
Package: live-initramfs
Version: 1.236.2-1
Tags: patch
When booting with nosudo, you can still do virtually anything you want
on the system, because PolicyKit will grant all permissions to the live
user.
Attached patch fixes the bug.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “A han
