On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 09:53:24PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> Is it an option to get aufs back into the Debian kernel until #1 is
> completed and reaches mainline? (I could understand that you want to
> add a deadline if you make such a promise, of course :)
no, there is no rush for the upcoming
Package: live-boot-initramfs-tools
Version: 3.0~a16-1
Severity: normal
Please migrate the usage of /dev/.initramfs to /run/initramfs dir.
The next initramfs-tools release 0.99 will use /run and no longer
have /dev/.initramfs per se.
thank you.
--
maks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wh
[snipping crosspost to d-release ]
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:55:16PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'll be requesting removal of
> > linux-modules-extra-2.6 rather than updating it.
>
> where was this discussed? how will be binary modules provided in the
> future? why w
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:35:53PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> How would I specify the nodma then?
>
> If it is only read from options present in the ramdisk I cannot boot
> on devices with broken DMA (intel BX/LX/VX chipsets with certain
> CD-ROMs for one).
as a boot arg for example, kern
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Chris Lamb wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> > reassign 442333 live-initramfs
>
> Hm, really? According to my tests, the ide modules are already loaded
> before mou
