On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 20:19:49 +, Jason Zions wrote:
> Starting some time in the past 24-48 hours, my attempts to build a pretty
> straight-forward live .iso file started failing during the
> chroot_install-packages step. The configuration I'm using has worked reliably
> for more than a w
On 1/28/19 8:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 18:44 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> 9.7 is a bit overdue already (current events being a bit of a time-
>> sink).
>>
>> Please indicate your availablility out of:
>>
>> - (Feb 2 unlikely, FOSDEM)
>> - Feb 9
>> - Feb 16
>
>
Hi,
we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4.
Can you please let us know your availability on the following:
- March 3
- March 10
- March 17
- March 24
- March 31
Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release. Here
are some dates, please let us know which ones would work.
* April 8-9
* April 15-16
* April 22-23
* April 29-30
* May 6-7
I know at least Adam can't do 15-16 so that one is most likely out anyway.
Cheers,
Julien
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 14:19:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible
> dates, please reply with availability.
>
Thanks all for the quick replies. Let's plan for 8.7 on Jan 14th/15th.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible
dates, please reply with availability.
Jan 7th/8th
Jan 14th/15th
Jan 21st/22nd
Jan 28th/29th - Cambridge BSP, probably not ideal
Feb 4th/5th - FOSDEM, probably not great either
Feb 11th/12th
Thanks,
Julien
signa
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 23:04:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> September 3rd/4th
>
Won't work for me.
> September 10th/11th
>
> September 17th/18th
>
Should be ok.
Cheers,
Julien
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 08:59:38 -0400, Yoimer Roman wrote:
> Dear Debian personnel,
>
> May God Bless you all. My name is Yoimer and I work as a Consultant
> Internet of Things Engineer. I am emailing you guys since my task doesn't
> look pretty straightforward to me at least now hahaha. I am ru
Hi,
The next point release for "jessie" (8.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
June 4th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi,
The next (and last) point release for "wheezy" (7.11) is scheduled for
Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into
wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Cheers,
Julien
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 20:20:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to
> avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around
> the same time, so if that works for everyone let's d
Hi,
with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to
avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around
the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the
same Saturday again.
Some suggested dates:
June 4th/5th
June 11th/12th
June 18t
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:24:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing
> both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD
> team seem happy to try it again.
>
> Some suggested dates:
>
> March 12th /
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 19:52:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some
> potential September dates:
>
> 5/6th - okay for me
> 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon
> 19th/20th - looks okay
> 26t
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 21:11:44 -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > When it finds the PCI ID of the vbox graphic card, it wrongly assumes
> > that the vboxvideo driver is installed, which it may not be true.
> >
> > Then it creates (or an already created configuration file is copied) a
> > file in /
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 00:14:17 +0100, Eugenio 'g7' Paolantonio wrote:
> Package: live-config
> Version: 3.0.15-1
> Tags: patch
>
> The xserver-xorg script is forcing the 'vboxvideo' driver on virtualbox
> even if the guest additions (virtualbox-guest-x11 package) are not
> installed. This leads
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 23:54:18 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Questions:
> A. if we build a debian-installer package against the old linux kernel
> ABI, and then images with that debian-installer, will the installer
> be able to install a kernel with the old ABI to begin with, *and* a
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:35:26 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> retitle 604783 support regular installer bootmenu entries
> severity 604783 wishlist
> thanks
>
> the release-team has removed live-installer from squeeze, we're not
> including d-i on the images then, and this becomes wishlist for 3
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 603974 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye
Hi,
there seems to be no update or progress on this bug (or the other
'serious' one) in a month, so I'll remove live-installer from squeeze
later this week.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
tag 595463 moreinfo
kthxbye
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:02:06 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 09:02:00AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Package: release-notes
> > Owner: debian-live@lists.debian.org
> >
> > the release notes should more prominently state t
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:30:42 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: live-build
> Severity: serious
>
> now that live-installer was fixed to be disabled through preseeding,
> live-builds needs to include boot entries for
> installer-without-live-installer and installer-with-live-installer.
>
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 14:37:18 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: live-build
>
> so that we don't forget.. before squeeze, we need to update the squeeze
> syslinux menu stuff for what we discussed on debconf (run/install etc.).
>
This doesn't sound RC to me. Either way, status update ple
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 14:36:13 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: live-build
>
> so that we don't forget.. before squeeze, we need to update, at least,
> the forensics package list, and review the rest.
>
What's the status of this?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 13:54:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > owner 595420 debian-live@lists.debian.org
> Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
> Owner recorded as debian-l...@lists.debian.org.
> > owner 59
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 17:07:22 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> After some discussion, we feel that the fact that runit-run can be
> installed, and unless further manual action is taken, it will make the
> computer unbootable to indicate that the package is unreleaseable.
>
It's not getting remove
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 19:58:57 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> your problem is that the prebuilt aufs-modules-* packages were requested
> to be removed to early by the kernel team. until 2.6.32 migrates to
> squeeze, you cannot build squeeze images. in the meanwhile, just pin the
> kernel package
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 15:58:48 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Let's look a bit closer at the two points above. The first point, updating the
> X configuration, seems to require a single change: The mouse driver should be
> replaced with the "vboxmouse" driver, to get mouse integration. X is a
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 09:02:19 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009, 16:19:14, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 08:53:21 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> > > Since what it's proposed expose the password in crypted way, it seems
>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 08:53:21 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> Since what it's proposed expose the password in crypted way, it seems
> a better approach of what we got since today.
>
I think it's worse, because it gives a false sense of security.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
do_stop() would previously just return in non-persistent mode, without
doing any checks for net vs usb vs cd boot, and without doing the eject
and prompt.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
---
debian/live-initramfs.init |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 06:39 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> diff --git a/helpers/lh_binary_linux-image b/helpers/lh_binary_linux-image
> index f5abaab..0b1c542 100755
> --- a/helpers/lh_binary_linux-image
> +++ b/helpers/lh_binary_linux-image
> @@ -53,19 +53,11 @@ case "${LH_INITRAMFS}" in
> esac
>
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 13:39:26 +0100, schoappied wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know how to start a 'chroot environment'
> (chroot chroot)
>
> How do I start gnome in xnest while in a chroot environment? So I can
> customize the gnome desktop?
>
Bind-mount /tmp inside your chroot, so the X11 socket direct
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 15:44:14 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > When LH_UNION_FILESYSTEM and LH_LINUX_PACKAGES are left undefined
>
> how are you *exactely* constructing a situation where they are undefined?
>
We're only defining in config/* the variables for which
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:18:53 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> Ok, but useradd should chown them when the user is created at runtime. Do you
> see wrong uid in the RUNNING system?
>
I'm talking about the files in /etc, not the ones in /home. That is,
/etc itself, /etc/skel, and all the files un
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 08:36:10 +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 September 2008, 19:13:48, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Unless the files/directories in config/chroot_local-includes/ are owned
> > by root on the host, they end up owned by a random user on the cd.
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 18:30:58 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> You shouldn't be chowning at all. Place your home directory files in
> /etc/skel/ and they will be chowned automatically by user-setup/adduser.
>
Unless the files/directories in config/chroot_local-includes/ are owned
by root on the
36 matches
Mail list logo
